# DeFi — X 热门讨论 (2026-10-09 14:35 UTC)
## @aave (Aave) · 10-09 14:06 · ♥176 ↻7 💬6 Builders can now connect the Aave MCP to the @MetaMask Agent Wallet, linking DeFi's credit layer to agentic finance.
The Aave MCP prepares Aave actions, and the Agent Wallet signs and submits them.
Get started below. https://t.co/LBhJquCYdK https://x.com/aave/status/2108559774946398568
## @daisy_btc988 (Daisy (💜,🌟)) · 10-09 07:51 · ♥74 ↻3 💬82 One idea from @termix_ai that could fundamentally change how we think about AI agents: LLM-Native Wallets
Give an AI Agent its own crypto wallet, and it can do more than execute tasks
It can sign transactions, manage funds, and pay execution fees independently
Combined with https://t.co/u0HwyRCBJ8, this creates something much bigger: an AI workforce that can not only act autonomously, but also own and manage the financial layer behind its work
The shift from AI that assists to AI that can operate is getting very real.
#Crypto #DeFi #AI https://x.com/daisy_btc988/status/2108465484521750720
## @bella_quack (Bella Quack) · 10-09 08:09 · ♥72 ↻1 💬79 Here’s where @agenticscredit could become bigger than a trading app.
The ACS is designed as an API and embeddable widget, meaning other builders can use the score to underwrite, gate or price products around real trading performance.
Imagine a DeFi app asking:
Who is this trader?
How consistent are they?
How much risk do they take?
Should this wallet qualify?
Instead of rebuilding that entire evaluation system, the answer could simply be the ACS.
That’s when a credit score stops being a feature and starts becoming infrastructure. https://x.com/bella_quack/status/2108469889459798024
## @Hercules_Defi (Hercules | DeFi) · 10-09 08:43 · ♥72 ↻4 💬19 .@Starknet could become an L1 real soon.
the goal is building the first fully quantum-resistant network.
reading @EliBenSasson's post yesterday, this might be a reasonable move ngl.
there were many reasons he stated.
➥ 𝐐𝐮𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐮𝐦 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠
it could eventually threaten crypto's security foundations.
now we are in the AI era, and that could even accelerate discoveries of weaknesses.
these are 2 threats that need long-term security planning.
seeing starknet explore the possibility is really refreshing and fitting.
it already has a strong foundation through STARK proofs.
but quantum resistance goes beyond the proof system itself.
wallet signatures, hashing, and data availability also matter.
➥ 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐮𝐦 𝐝𝐞𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐲
Starknet currently relies on Ethereum for important security functions.
that creates dependencies when upgrading its security architecture.
some vulnerabilities cannot be addressed through Starknet alone.
becoming an L1 could give Starknet greater control.
it could manage upgrades without relying entirely on Ethereum's timeline.
being able to do so much without relying on an external factor
i think that flexibility matters when security is the priority.
➥ 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐞 2027 𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬
StarkWare already has a roadmap for tackling these vulnerabilities.
the plan includes:
> BLAKE2 hashing > Falcon-512 signatures.
its native account abstraction also supports flexible signature upgrades.
these changes could strengthen Starknet's resistance to quantum attacks.
ethereum's broader roadmap targets quantum resistance by 2029.
starknet already has things in motion.
and they could even achieve this before ethereum.
it is really looking good.
➥ 𝐦𝐲 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰
i see this as a security-driven infrastructure decision.
Starknet wants greater control over its quantum-resistance roadmap.
becoming an L1 could help it pursue that goal.
but the transition alone won't guarantee complete quantum resistance.
every vulnerable component still needs proper attention and upgrades.
if starknet can deliver this, it will be very good for them.
and maybe other L2s might follow in this step.
they might really be setting a pace here. wishing them good luck. > 引用 @EliBenSasson: Starknet becoming an L1 for post-quantum agility: good idea or bad idea?
Two giant elements we need to pay attention to: (1) The quantum threat. It may be MUCH closer than we think.
(2) AI. It's becoming more powerful than we can process. Is anyone willing to bet how much time we have until AI breaks something that we considered as safe?
This calls for “bunker mode”. Chains need to become future-proofed. And fast.
Here's what it takes to make a chain truly future-proofed: - The right cryptography - Crypto agility - Becoming an L1
This connects to what I talked about in my Token2049 talk today. Here’s the summary: 🧵 https://x.com/Hercules_Defi/status/2108478378668159261