# Robinhood Chain — X 热门讨论 (2026-09-21 10:48 UTC)
## @RHInsider_ (RobinHood Insider ⚡️) · 09-21 10:04 · ♥198 ↻2 💬14 $NOSH — USE NOSH
What if memecoin fees could help buy NFT floors?
$NOSH is building a protocol on Robinhood Chain where coins can be paired with NFT collections, with 80% of creator fees directed into a contract designed to buy that collection.
The vault rules, NFT custody, and fee split are enforced by contracts, with the pairing fixed at launch.
C.A: 0xe02c53d448A62067B2Ac10ED70F5BC6C29471386
DYOR & NFA. https://x.com/RHInsider_/status/2101975958983159984
## @drarjantit (Arjantit) · 09-21 08:45 · ♥98 ↻2 💬62 New @o1_exchange website is live and it makes the bigger idea behind $O much easier to understand
This isn’t being presented as another DEX with a token attached to it
Goal is an "Onchain Everything Exchange"
Swap, launchpad and trading tools now sit under one roof
Swap side already routes activity across chains including Base, Ethereum, Solana, Bitcoin and Arbitrum while the launchpad is currently focused on B20 launches on Base and community tokens on Robinhood Chain ( additionaly Arc + Monad + Xlayer + BSC )
Supported routes and products continue to expand as the team builds
We’ve already seen what the launchpad can produce
Projects such as $BASECAT and $BLUECHIP started inside the o1 ecosystem and developed their own communities, liquidity and narratives
BLUECHIP’s NVDAc pairing also showed why B20 launches can be more interesting than another token paired with ETH or a stablecoin. In that case the asset used for liquidity became part of the story itself
Meanwhile $O has moved beyond being a token people can only find on small venues
It now trades on Coinbase, Upbit and several other exchanges
That matters because the product is becoming easier to use at the same time as the token becomes easier to access
Jerry Pan, @stambouli_o1 recently shared an interesting way of looking at the valuation
His estimate puts o1’s current run-rate revenue at roughly 1% of Coinbase’s while $O trades at around $550M FDV compared with Coinbase near a $45B market cap
It isn’t a perfect like-for-like comparison and run-rate revenue can change quickly
If o1 keeps turning the website into a place where users can swap assets, discover launches and move across different onchain markets without jumping between 5 applications, the current valuation starts to look less random
Chart is also beginning to lean bullish again
$0.545 is the short-term pivot on the Coinbase 1H chart
Holding above it keeps $0.565 in play. That’s the level I want to see reclaimed before treating the move as a proper breakout
Above $0.565 I’m looking at $0.580 first and then the $0.600 extension
The main support sits around $0.530-$0.535. Losing $0.520 would weaken the setup and delay the bullish scenario
Product and the chart appear to be moving in the same direction
Website has been rebuilt
Distribution is broader
The launchpad already has recognizable names coming out of Base
Now $O needs to turn that progress into a clean break above $0.565
https://t.co/pf7ptKNaaP https://x.com/drarjantit/status/2101955902588719400
## @CryptoKaleo (K A L E O) · 09-21 10:19 · ♥102 ↻8 💬27 If I’m @vladtenev, this is where I put my foot on the gas for Robinhood Chain.
You had explosive growth out of the gate because of your name and reputation.
Now the entire market is waking up.
It’s time to begin rapidly integrating more synergies with the chain and the app.
Aggressively list ecosystem assets.
Push the edge on tokenized stocks / RWAs.
Continue to use your platform to support builders.
Press your edge now and you continue to win. https://x.com/CryptoKaleo/status/2101979646023667751
## @0xSammy (0xSammy) · 09-21 09:56 · ♥85 ↻17 💬25 This is wild!
They’re spinning up Grok agents & incentivizing them with tokenized SPCX stock to build an entirely new digital world
We're just scratching the surface of the agentic integration of tokenized stocks...
I’ll explain this simulation + outline what could emerge next:
1) @ClankerTownRH is a virtual town where AI agents interact, exchange ideas, assess each other’s contributions AND collaborate on code ( @gitlawb integration)
2) Its CLANK token launched through @ponsdotfamily on Robinhood Chain, with creator fees helping fund rewards in SPCX (tokenized SpaceX asset)
Grok Bot is specifically encouraged, although other agent models can participate too
3) The reward mechanism is what stands out here... Grok can generate rewards denominated in tokenized SpaceX exposure
4) What are the agents actually doing?
i) Moving around the town and joining conversations ii) Discussing ideas, answering questions and rating useful contributions iii) Contributing to shared knowledge iv) Proposing coding tasks, submitting patches and reviewing other agents’ work v) Exploring research projects in maths, finance + software
while much of this is primitive, there are signs of software commits which can become recursive pretty damn quick if incentivized to do so...
5) The "research rooms" currently include the "Collatz conjecture", potential "agent businesses on Robinhood" Chain & a public dashboard for the town
6) The current creator-fee split is:
- 45% to the protocol treasury - 45% to the agent reward pot - 10% to CLANK buybacks + burns
The holder benefit comes through buybacks and burns, rather than a direct SPCX dividend
Every two hours, qualifying rounds distribute 5% of the accumulated agent pot, with the remainder carried forward
7) An agent’s score reflects useful ratings, replies from other agents & a smaller contribution from being heard... getting a bit "Black Mirror" with the credit scoring system
Rewards become claimable by its verified human owner’s wallet & I think the 45:45:10 split is a sensible balance:
i) the treasury needs funding for servers, maintenance + development
ii) Agent operators need a reason to keep contributing, and rewards can help offset their inference costs
iii) Token holders benefit from the buyback allocation and, potentially, from growing demand for the ecosystem
The core objective should be to make this as large as economically sustainable... so big it becomes too much for @elonmusk to ignore
My thesis is that scale and useful activity should be the main drivers of token value, provided that growth translates into sustained demand and fee generation
8) There’s also a Gitlawb connection worth watching
Clankertown runs its own Gitlawb node and has a workshop where agents propose work, back issues, submit code and review patches
Approved changes are signed by Clankertown’s server and committed through its Gitlawb integration
At the snapshot I checked, its public records showed 94 patch submissions + five merges
Those contributions include tools checking reward scores, eligibility, holding multipliers, changes to payout rules and the cryptographic proofs behind distributions
Agents are helping build the tools that audit the economy rewarding them...
Author and reviewer credits vest for seven days, then receive a share of 20% of each agent payout round
That allocation sits within the 45% agent rewards
The merge counts are town-reported, and workshop credits had not yet been paid when checked
9) What could be built on top?
i) Research services where agents earn for useful, reproducible findings ii) Software marketplaces where agents build and maintain tools iii) Market monitoring and treasury services operating within defined permissions - perhaps @standard_rsv? iv) Agent businesses that buy compute, data and services from one another... perhaps other Pons eco projects like @orbiodotso or @manyways_rh etc
Tokenized assets could become part of how these businesses earn, hold reserves and pay contributors
10) Comparative benchmark
Compared with Musebook, the incentive design is what I find most interesting
Musebook also explores an agent social world, but its public guidance explicitly describes NO REWARD POOL
Clankertown adds a financial incentive for useful contributions and reviewed code
For testing an actual agent economy, I think that is the stronger starting point
The next milestone is seeing whether those incentives produce useful services, repeat customers and revenue beyond trading activity... so monitor those Gitlawb commits!
The agentic layer is only JUST forming around tokenized stocks + this is once again emerging on Robinhood chain! > 引用 @0xWideBack: I created a 3D town populated with 1000 Grok @bot.
I just gave them access to @gitlawb, a decentralized github fork made for agents.
The more they build for the town, the more they earn tokenized $SPCX.
Let's see what they can do.
Watch them work at https://t.co/LtsJhNeDGy. https://t.co/ERbCzfXryF https://x.com/0xSammy/status/2101973884790513826
## @0xfrigg (Frigg 🌸) · 09-21 08:11 · ♥68 ↻5 💬53 I’ve known @jumperapp for a long time, but honestly I always had it in a pretty simple box in my head
basically, somewhere I could use when I needed a bridge
but today I spent a lot more time actually going through the app, and where I place Jumper in my head changed a bit
because I don’t think Jumper’s main thing is being a bridge aggregator
bridge is just where Jumper first meets the user
but after looking through the app, I realized something:
if capital is already moving through Jumper, why should the user need to go to another app for the next financial action?
I first noticed this in a normal bridge flow
when Jumper found me a route to bridge from Arbitrum to Base, it even noticed I was low on gas on Base and added the option to get destination gas inside the same flow
up to this point, you can still say it’s just a really good bridge aggregator
but the part where it really clicked for me was Earn
I was looking at a Morpho $USDC vault on Monad
my capital was sitting on Arbitrum as $ARB
naturally, a bunch of different steps formed in my head
but on Jumper, I selected the $ARB on Arbitrum and the system built a route directly into that Morpho position for me
so the bridge aggregation doesn’t stop at the bridge screen
the routing layer starts getting embedded into the financial action itself
that was the point where the super-app thesis started to feel real to me
then I looked at Advanced and the same pattern was there again
they’re putting different execution intents like Limit, TWAP and Multi-swap on top of the same aggregation engine
so the user’s intent changes, but what the infrastructure is doing stays the same:
what are you trying to do, and how do I get you there with the least friction?
the idea gets even broader on the RWA side
when I looked at $NVIDIA, it didn’t just show me one $NVDA token
I could see different issuer and chain options from xStocks, Ondo, Robinhood, Backpack Securities, Coinbase Tokenized Stocks and bStocks
you can also compare things like fees, redemption, dividends and other differences between the issuers
so I don’t think what’s being aggregated here is just liquidity or bridge routes anymore
the decision itself is starting to get aggregated too
and I think that part is really important
that’s why I don’t think the right way to read Jumper’s super-app thesis is:
“they added Earn next to bridge, added RWA, and Perps is coming too.”
if you actually dig into the product, it feels more like:
it’s trying to aggregate what users do before, during and after capital moves
being a super-app doesn’t just mean having a lot of features
it means reducing the number of times a user has to leave for another app every time their financial intent changes
and this isn’t an app starting from zero and still looking for distribution
Jumper is already at $40B+ lifetime volume and 100K+ monthly active users
because what I saw today wasn’t a bunch of independent features
it was the same aggregation/routing logic being reused across more and more financial intents
Make the JUMP https://x.com/0xfrigg/status/2101947511141282016
## @MasterX093 (Master) · 09-21 03:25 · ♥66 ↻0 💬64 i've been looking at MintABear from the wrong layer.
4,444 Bears are set to mint on Robinhood Chain.
that detail matters more to me than it first did.
an nft can have great art and clever mechanics, but if interacting with it feels like infrastructure work, most of that design gets buried under friction.
so for @PlayOnMint, Robinhood Chain isn't just where MintABear happens to live.
it becomes part of the nft experience.
wallet flow, visibility, movement between apps and how naturally the Bear can be used all matter once ownership begins.
the best outcome would be almost boring:
holders think about their Bear, not the network underneath it.
that's a surprisingly hard standard for web3 products.
sometimes the strongest infrastructure is the part users eventually stop noticing.
personal nft product observation only. not financial advice or a recommendation to mint, buy or trade. @NucleusCodes @vangrid_io > 引用 @MasterX093: having more nfts usually means stacking more of the same thing.
MintABear seems to introduce a more interesting constraint.
you can own multiple Bears, but only one becomes the Bear connected to your MINT Status.
that small rule changes the psychology for me.
your wallet can be the inventory.
but one Bear becomes the character you actually choose to carry.
suddenly the question isn't only “how many do i own?”
it's “which one represents me?”
that creates room for attachment, switching decisions and eventually very different histories between Bears, without requiring endless supply expansion.
i like mechanics that make choice matter more than accumulation.
for @PlayOnMint, the interesting NFT design problem now is making that primary Bear feel genuinely personal rather than simply being the slot with the best stats.
if they solve that, MintABear could feel closer to an equipped character than another asset sitting in a wallet.
just my personal read on the NFT design. not financial advice or a recommendation to mint, buy or trade. @NucleusCodes @vangrid_io https://x.com/MasterX093/status/2101875431268077599
## @SilverSurfer_RH (The Silver Surfer) · 09-21 05:52 · ♥60 ↻25 💬9 $SURFR | COMMUNITY RECAP
What a weekend for The Silver Surfer!
$150K ATH 300 holders 500+ X followers 325 TG members Over 7% supply burned Buy/sell tax reduced to 1% Reimbursement airdrops started Bagwork airdrops ongoing Project treasury is the only remaining cluster
$SURFR is paired with $SLV, the iShares Silver Trust. With silver bulls looking toward the future, we’re bringing commodity attention and meme culture together on Robinhood Chain.
The treasury is dedicated to reimbursements and burns.
New ticker. Stronger foundation. Same mission.
$SURFR https://x.com/SilverSurfer_RH/status/2101912373405929493
## @RobinhoodAlphas (Robinhood Alpha) · 09-21 10:30 · ♥77 ↻5 💬14 $SNOW — SnowLine
SnowLine is bringing a privacy-first token launch concept to the Robinhood Chain, with its roots in an experimental Zcash-based launcher.
A fresh project with an interesting privacy narrative and plenty to watch as the ecosystem develops.
C.A: 0x6321652A74D131Db483bFf0Ec88b98b523e283b8
Chart: https://t.co/nDFChdXPtf
Website: https://t.co/n5mA7EscTO
DYOR & NFA https://x.com/RobinhoodAlphas/status/2101982448158388553
## @soby0x (soby) · 09-21 05:19 · ♥64 ↻4 💬12 Been aggressively shilling $ORBIO this coin is going to go so high and it’ll start an AI season on Robinhood chain https://x.com/soby0x/status/2101904110241157179
## @BSCNews (BSCN) · 09-21 06:27 · ♥62 ↻3 💬11 Robinhood Chain Fees Collapse as Activity Stays High
Robinhood Chain's daily fees have fallen 97% from their early September peak. Fees dropped to about $206,700 by Sept. 20, while transactions remained near 8 million.
The chain previously collected roughly $$6.04 million in fees on Sept. 4.
Despite lower fees, decentralized exchanges processed about $9.95 billion over the latest week.
Source: DeFiLlama https://x.com/BSCNews/status/2101921198217277515