# Robinhood — X 热门讨论 (2026-10-10 05:17 UTC)
## @CryptoKaleo (K A L E O) · 10-10 03:54 · ♥122 ↻10 💬37 Bullish on Robinhood Chain > 引用 @MEADGod: Bullish on Robinhood Chain https://x.com/CryptoKaleo/status/2108768162506522955
## @Sirbest247 (John Mark💫) · 10-10 04:23 · ♥73 ↻12 💬69 Researching Robinhood Chain shouldn’t start with “what’s pumping?”
It should start with a better question:
Who is actually building, what have they shipped, and what evidence supports it?
That’s the problem @HeyResearch is trying to solve.
$HEY | https://t.co/ErwNZeXT2U
A VIDEO 🎥 & THE THREAD 🧵 https://x.com/Sirbest247/status/2108775493742764310
## @wizzybanks26 (Wiz Onchain 🥷💎) · 10-10 03:55 · ♥67 ↻19 💬59 Beyond the TGE: How TRUE Is Connecting AI Trading, Multichain Finance, and Real Token Utility https://x.com/wizzybanks26/status/2108768379154608174
## @ChuzzyTech (Cleopatra) · 10-10 04:21 · ♥70 ↻7 💬71 There are free zaps waiting on the progress bar in Zaps.
When i opened my profile and clicked the progress section, I saw them there.
I have claimed the Welcome zaps, 50 total when you finish all three:
Follow @zerufinance on X gives 15 zaps. Join the Telegram gives 15 zaps. Join the Discord, 20 zaps. Share your invite on X, 5 zaps.
All of those i have completed on mine.
That is 55 zaps from simple actions, no trading needed.
One more task is left as referring a friend is a continuous tasks.
And that is zScore mint that pays 100 zaps. The screen describes it as minting your onchain reputation.
I have not done this one yet. The 100 for the zScore mint is the biggest single task on the list.
It takes $6 of ETH on Robinhood to mint.
Want to see yours? Start here: https://t.co/X1UIQLvKF8
Which of these tasks would you do first? https://x.com/ChuzzyTech/status/2108774850168864881
## @0xSagaLab (CryptoSaga) · 10-10 03:41 · ♥67 ↻4 💬63 GM to absolutely everyone who GM back ⚡
Mint, 10 Oct. The date is now in the paper.
https://t.co/WWCDeiphDg. TGE target: 20 October 2026. Chain: Robinhood Chain. ERC-20. 1 billion fixed. No public sale. Issuer: Hunter Hawk Ltd.
Season 1 airdrop is sized in the document. $125,000 at the $0.033 reference price = 3,787,879 $MNTD. Claim opens at TGE. Snapshot date is still not posted. XP ends at that snapshot. After that, progression is $MNTD only.
Eligibility bar remains $50 cumulative qualifying play on https://t.co/SgFX6TikeC. Referrals: 10% XP and 10% of referred house edge, if the invite deposits $10 and wagers $10.
Other pre-TGE issuance is capped. Daily Drip campaign maximum is 750,000 $MNTD. Unclaimed places are not issued. Mint A Bear holders get a separate $MNTD airdrop after the mint, in two tranches. Size not published yet.
A Bear is 4,444. Free on Robinhood. Upgrades spend $MNTD. Half is burned. One linked Bear boosts that account’s Status rate.
Status: seven levels. Stake is valued in dollars at the time you stake. Flexible unless you turn on a lock boost. Staking rewards pool is 15.70% of supply. @PlayOnMint https://x.com/0xSagaLab/status/2108764935895335350
## @GpaAndy (Andy the Jet) · 10-10 01:30 · ♥59 ↻0 💬59 the newest MintABear update is not another reward announcement.
@PlayOnMint is asking the community which traits are a must-have before the collection drops on Robinhood in the coming weeks. Instalker
i actually like this more than revealing another utility bullet point.
traits are where an nft starts becoming social.
if the collection captures the memes, personalities and references people inside MINT already recognize, choosing a Bear stops being only about rarity.
you start looking for the one that feels like you.
and that matters because MintABear already has a functional role through $MNTD activation, progression and reward distributions. the art does not need to carry the entire value proposition by itself.
utility can give people a reason to keep the Bear.
identity can give them a reason to care which Bear they keep.
that combination is much harder to manufacture after launch.
so if @PlayOnMint is collecting trait ideas now, i would rather see them turn actual community culture into the collection than fill 4,444 Bears with random rarity for the sake of rarity https://x.com/GpaAndy/status/2108731745025573272
## @kane_tdt (Kane) · 10-10 01:40 · ♥52 ↻1 💬51 gm fam
opened an address on Etherscan the way I always do, and the transfers were not the only number on the page.
@zerufinance has a zScore sitting in the cards tab, 0 to 1000, built from what that wallet already did. swaps, loans, liquidity, staking, votes, reward claims. past activity gets folded into one mark. no connect, no profile. the tape was public anyway. this just sums it next to the rows.
same card is on BaseScan, BscScan, Arbiscan, PolygonScan, Linea, and the Robinhood explorer they listed in the Oct 8 post. claiming Zaps is a separate click. it turns that history into a points balance. Hall of Fame is the joined list, not the score. they say 25,000+ addresses have already opted into that side.
what I am less sure about is the gap. wash volume is supposed to land near zero, and repeating the same few actions is not meant to open a wide lead. two wallets can still look nothing alike and land close. the number is the tape. the Zap is the readout. they have not said how often the tape gets reread. https://x.com/kane_tdt/status/2108734258466714041
## @paperdao_xyz (PaperDAO) · 10-10 02:31 · ♥50 ↻9 💬22 robinhood:0xbc2283d12b1f2f46c1613ae672e95c55b69ca414 in, paper out. https://x.com/paperdao_xyz/status/2108747263874924697
## @qkaypham (qkpham 🌊) · 10-09 23:10 · ♥53 ↻11 💬1 🚨🏹 $WALLET — WE JUST UNCOVERED SOMETHING VERY INTERESTING ABOUT DEPLOYER aa33! 👀
Remember aa33, the $WALLET deployer funded by F718 during Robinhood Chain’s earliest blocks?
Robinhood Wallet labels it a “PROHIBITED ADDRESS”, while Rabby fails to send ETH to it BEFORE Ledger confirmation.
So I decided to investigate using Hoppscotch and Robinhood Chain’s own RPC. 🔬
HERE ARE MY RESULTS:
✅ TEST 1 — ETH Gas Estimation
eth_estimateGas → 0x5484
Result: 21,636 gas — SUCCESS!
✅ TEST 2 — Smart Account Code
eth_getCode → 0xef0100...
CONFIRMED: aa33 uses EIP-7702 delegation to Alchemy’s Modular Account V2 implementation!
✅ TEST 3 — Gas Estimation With My Actual Ledger Address
eth_estimateGas → 0x52eb
Result: 21,227 gas — SUCCESS AGAIN!
🔥 NOW HERE’S THE INTERESTING PART:
Robinhood Chain’s own RPC can successfully simulate an ETH transfer to aa33.
Yet:
🚫 Robinhood Wallet flags aa33 as prohibited.
🚫 Rabby fails BEFORE my Ledger can sign.
✅ Rabby works normally with other receiving addresses.
SAME NETWORK. SAME SENDER. DIFFERENT RECIPIENT.
This suggests an address-specific wallet restriction or transaction-preparation issue, NOT an obvious blockchain-level inability to receive ETH.
And we’re talking about the SAME aa33 connected to the early F718 funding trail and $WALLET deployment. 👀🏹
Could it be security screening? EIP-7702 compatibility? Something else?
But now we have reproducible technical evidence instead of speculation.
THE aa33 MYSTERY JUST GOT DEEPER. 🔍🔥
Next test: MetaMask.
$WALLET 🏹
aa33: 0x542718C390Ef1E4bEB46ce2023FfaA627db8aa33 https://x.com/qkaypham/status/2108696564466143281
## @0xyunss (yunus) · 10-10 03:24 · ♥54 ↻6 💬4 Playing Different Size LPs in Meteora https://x.com/0xyunss/status/2108760641955840043
## @Sirbest247 (John Mark💫) · 10-10 04:24 · ♥52 ↻0 💬1 2/10
So, what is Hey Research Lab?
I see it as a builder-intelligence layer for Robinhood Chain.
Instead of treating price as the whole story, HEY tracks development signals, meaningful ships, builder activity and source-backed evidence.
The goal: research the builder behind the token. https://x.com/Sirbest247/status/2108775630611366121