# DefiLlama fees — X 热门讨论 (2026-09-29 22:57 UTC)

## @MastrXYZ (MASTR) · 09-29 17:24 · ♥28 ↻7 💬2 We still kiss far too much ass in this extraction industry, rewarding the biggest names with attention and loyalty while better, more honest builders struggle to get noticed.

People are creatures of habit, especially in crypto: see the same name often enough and familiarity starts passing for credibility. A massive following becomes a substitute for checking someone’s record.

Take @AxiomExchange .

I expanded my investigation to 60 transactions on Robinhood Chain.

Of the 58 successful executions, 25 from 23 different sender addresses included an additional ETH payment to the same recipient, alongside network fees and a separate payment to the trading-fee distributor.

In the newer router sample from September 29, that extra payment appeared in 17 of 23 successful trades. The amounts varied, but the recipient kept repeating.

In an August 1 transaction, the extra payment was 0.001 ETH against roughly 0.000003607 ETH in network fees, approximately 277 times the gas cost.

A September 29 example showed another 0.001 ETH payment, around 224 times its network fee.

Robinhood’s own documentation explicitly states that priority gas auctions do not exist and higher gas fees cannot move a transaction ahead of others already queued.

The recurring recipient also made 19 outgoing transfers totalling 3,817.776 ETH, equivalent to approximately $10.19 million at the reference price used in this investigation.

Those are documented wallet outflows.

I have not established that every ETH came from these extra payments, who ultimately controls the wallet, or what service the payments bought.

@DefiLlama 's ordinary trading-fee calculation is separate.

Calling the entire amount proven revenue from a nonexistent feature would go beyond the evidence.

But the repeated payments are there, and Axiom owes traders a clear explanation.

If the money buys faster delivery to the sequencer, name the service, disclose the recipient and demonstrate the advantage.

Users already paying trading fees should not have to reconstruct transaction traces to understand the additional money leaving their wallets.

I’m tired of watching this industry treat scrutiny as bad manners whenever the company collecting the money is popular enough.

The people with the most reach and the strongest financial incentives should face the hardest questions, yet somehow they keep getting the easiest fucking pass. > 引用 @MrketInsider: JUST IN: AXIOM REPORTEDLY CHARGED USERS $10M IN FEES FOR A FEATURE THAT DOESN’T EXIST

AXIOM TRADERS HAVE BEEN PAYING FOR “PRIORITY TRANSACTIONS” ON ROBINHOOD CHAIN

HOWEVER, IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO FRONT FUN TRANSACTIONS ON ROBINHOOD BY PAYING EXTRA FEES

THE SEQUENCER OPERATES ON A FIRST COME, FIRST SERVE BASIS https://x.com/MastrXYZ/status/2104985789436228074

## @packedcc (PACKED | PACKD) · 09-29 16:26 · ♥26 ↻4 💬5 Don't take our word for it. Check @DefiLlama.

Packed is now listed on DefiLlama as a Launchpad.

DefiLlama is the biggest open dashboard in crypto. It tracks the fees and value of thousands of protocols, counted straight from the blockchain by open code anyone can read. Investors, analysts and journalists use it to compare projects.

What it shows for Packed: - the fees Packed earns on Robinhood Chain and Ethereum - Packed in the same list as every other Robinhood Chain launchpad, counted by the same rules

https://t.co/bTdweVncoA https://x.com/packedcc/status/2104971142343930057