# Robinhood — X 热门讨论 (2026-09-22 14:19 UTC)
## @arbitrum (Arbitrum) · 09-22 13:40 · ♥104 ↻7 💬17 On the floor of the NYSE, @itsbrendanma from the Arbitrum Foundation joined @FINTECHTVglobal to share why Robinhood building on Arbitrum is a big deal for finance
10% of their net transaction revenue flows back to the Arbitrum treasury and it grows with adoption https://t.co/NFHuvRKrLR https://x.com/arbitrum/status/2102392480331108390
## @DAXIAGUA1 (大西瓜) · 09-22 13:28 · ♥62 ↻11 💬50 这几天大盘行情非常好，最近在Robinhood Chain上看到的一个新东西 @tankdotcash ，把 meme 交易税和加油返现接在一起
我觉得有意思的地方在于，它没把交易税拿去做一个离普通人很远的故事。油钱每个月都要交，如果交易税能让你加油少花三成，它就从链上数字变成了账单上的价格影子
现在更像一套待验证的机制，把 meme 注意力和日常消费绑在一起。等产品上线，再看返现记录、金库变化和链上交易量
Robinhood Chain的热度确实降了不少，但我还在上面打狗什么的，现在热度会只是暂时降低了一点，很多人说 Robinhood一轮游了，我并不这么认为，现在还能出现 @tankdotcash 这种把链上手续费变成加油返现的玩法，实属惊喜，它把这种越界写得更直白：链上 Gas，变成加油返现。不是空喊回馈用户，而是对准一个所有人都疼的账单。油价越涨，这个切口越尖
Robinhood 的故事，可能真的才刚开始我们拭目以待 > 引用 @tankdotcash: People don’t realise @RobinhoodCrypto ith jutht getting thtarted… https://t.co/rV4m1BQcTb https://x.com/DAXIAGUA1/status/2102389503167955397
## @OnlyLJC (LJC) · 09-22 13:17 · ♥93 ↻4 💬31 In the next 6 months the traders who will be able to spot the capital rotation between Solana and Robinhood seasons there and back will make the most money.
Buy the bottom of the best coins and wait for the rotation back rinse and repeat on both chains. https://x.com/OnlyLJC/status/2102386783946526892
## @shakibmunsi0 (SHAKIB 🌱(Build Arc)🌱) · 09-22 12:45 · ♥61 ↻0 💬71 gN & gMint 🌙
big update for @PlayOnMint
$MNTD is coming to Robinhood
this adds another layer of accessibility to the MINT ecosystem, while the token remains connected to the broader MINT progression and reward system
for anyone following the ecosystem, this is one of those updates worth keeping an eye on
@PlayOnMint > 引用 @PlayOnMint: 🚨 Important Update! 🚨
The $MNTD token will drop on Robinhood 🟢🪶
Turn notis on and stay tuned for more updates! https://t.co/8bDZycymEv https://x.com/shakibmunsi0/status/2102378849766150653
## @Varashe_Baniya (Baniya) · 09-22 12:58 · ♥55 ↻0 💬67 Most casino tokens launch on a DEX, get farmed by the same 8,000 wallets, then die in a Telegram chart.
@PlayOnMint just said $MNTD will drop on Robinhood.
That does not make the token live. TGE is still Q4. Season 1 is still XP. The $50 wager bar did not move. What changed is the distribution surface.
A listing like that is built for people who will never open Uniswap. If $MNTD is supposed to be a Status token you stake for rakeback and lossback, putting it where normal users already have dollars is a different bet than another Base ticker for CT.
The risk is the opposite of what CT will tweet. Easy access can bring holders who never play on https://t.co/qxYnALLrHu. Status only works if the people who hold $MNTD are also the people who wager. If the float sits on Robinhood and the casino stays empty, you get a listing without a loop.
So the sequence is still the same, just with a bigger front door:
play → XP → Season 1 allocation → stake for Status after TGE
MintABear is still the identity layer. 4,444. Mechanics still TBA. Robinhood does not answer whether the bear changes what you earn when you play.
I’m treating the Robinhood line as distribution, not as a catalyst. The test is unchanged: does play on https://t.co/qxYnALLrHu still produce a reason to hold $MNTD once anyone can tap buy. Only on @NucleusCodes https://x.com/Varashe_Baniya/status/2102382000044757295
## @AltcoinSensei (The Altcoin Sensei) · 09-22 13:50 · ♥58 ↻12 💬19 robinhood:0xf44702b17d9abd53815f703e772f35e9c71a53af still so undervalued at these ranges.
Chart shows a clear bull flag, and I am expecting 10M very soon.
Fundamentals are very high on this one. It just ticks evert box. https://t.co/Qo4U80wWeT > 引用 @turtleonchain: The $RAXOL team is lining up things to take the protocol to the next level.
This is a screenshot from a team post in the official Telegram group just minutes ago. The post is longer with even more alpha but I will not share it here on X.
EF = Ethereum Foundation 💡 https://t.co/tCMt8Ksats https://x.com/AltcoinSensei/status/2102395006250000765
## @fede_intern (Fede’s intern 🥊) · 09-22 12:37 · ♥57 ↻7 💬8 i believe most engineering teams working on core ethereum will disappear over the next 3 years. there is no real money to be made there, and nowadays there isn't even that much status to gain from doing it. AI changed the landscape pretty fast because implementing a client is simply not as difficult as it used to be.
i actually think this is good for ethereum users and stakers. most crypto engineering teams outside ethereum will disappear even earlier.
lambda's biggest strategy is to just keep doing what we are doing while most people eventually vanish from crypto. there aren't many teams with lambda's combination of expertise in cryptography, compilers, security, consensus and performance, together with the connections we have across corporations and startups. we're finding different ways of making money from the connections and expertise we have across aligned and lambda.
i also don't think there are going to be many fundamentally new use cases beyond the ones we already know. what will happen instead is that ethereum will become the financial backend for a large part of international payments and fx.
there are almost no economic incentives to be a core dev, and i don't think donations from ETFs or similar mechanisms will fundamentally change that in the long run. the reason is that it doesn't make sense to keep pouring money into large groups of people that don't produce that much. most of the work that actually needs to be done is researching new ideas, testing them and implementing them well. the ethereum spec will likely end up being written in lean, and lean may eventually become one of the main implementations too.
there won't be a need for so many independent engineering teams, apart from having enough competition to keep progress moving quickly. the problem today is that many of the existing engineering teams have very little incentive for the system to change too much or too fast.
most people on CT believe the EF is the main thing blocking progress in ethereum. it's true that for a few years after the merge, i think research progress stagnated and we weren't bold enough outside of ZK research.
most of my criticism towards the EF was related to its size and the fact that it never prioritized making the UX of ethereum better or spreading the gospel to corporations and governments. now there are multiple new organizations doing this, so we're fine.
nowadays i believe engineering teams are the biggest bottleneck preventing ethereum from becoming faster and better. the EF is actually the one pushing things forward. most engineering teams have almost zero economic incentive for things to change dramatically.
what ethereum needs is to accelerate the natural consolidation of these engineering teams so that we can push for bigger changes much more aggressively. i hope the EF and CT start realizing this.
ethereum won't have a real competitor thanks to: - current network effects - formal verification - minimalism - post-quantum security - privacy - zk becoming stupidly fast, with proofs verifiable on basically any piece of hardware - lean ethereum: new consensus, faster p2p and faster finality, while supporting even more stakers and maximizing decentralization - propamms solving many of the problems around pricing assets and trading on a slower chain like ethereum
i don't think solana, tempo, hyperliquid or robinhood have a chance against Ethereum if we just focus on the important things and do the inevitable: remove the bottlenecks that slow progress. https://x.com/fede_intern/status/2102376691884585308