# "address poisoning" — X 热门讨论 (2026-09-30 01:08 UTC)
## @habibk79 (Habibk.HK) · 09-30 00:11 · ♥26 ↻4 💬23 GOOD MORNING EVERYONE
ONE COPY-PASTE CAN COST YOU EVERYTHING.
Address poisoning works because long wallet addresses are difficult to verify at a glance. Attackers can create lookalike addresses with matching characters, hoping users copy the wrong one during a transfer.
That’s where @Americanfort_io is taking a different approach.
Its Send to-Name™ system replaces long hexadecimal strings with a human readable @name. According to AmericanFortress, supported transaction flows can resolve that name to a fresh stealth address, reducing the need to copy and compare unfamiliar wallet strings.
That’s more than a cosmetic UX improvement. It changes the point where users can make a costly mistake.
Instead of asking, Did I copy the right address the experience moves toward Am I sending to the right @name?
Of course, users still need to verify the recipient and use supported integrations correctly.
Could Send-to Name™ make one of crypto’s most common human errors much harder to exploit? https://x.com/habibk79/status/2105088070274203990