# Robinhood — X 热门讨论 (2026-09-27 08:38 UTC)
## @eth_apple (ZAMA_APPLE🇰🇷) · 09-27 07:31 · ♥66 ↻36 💬34 🚨🚨🚨 Plooshies has announced plans to launch a game on Robinhood.
So what happens to the Abstract NFT holders? Are they simply being abandoned and left behind?
A quick reminder about $CUDDLE / @ThePlooshies.
I invested in January 2025 and waited patiently for over a year.
I never blamed them for delays, price performance, or even the possibility of failure. Those are risks I accepted as an investor.
They promised updates every 2–3 weeks, but not a single update was provided. Even on the final promised date, January 26, 2026, I had to reach out first.
It has now been approximately 1 year and 9 months, and I still haven’t received any meaningful updates. My messages continue to go unanswered. I’m bringing the tweet below back to attention in the hope that no one else has to go through the same experience. > 引用 @eth_apple: Before funding and after funding are two very different stories.
If there are other victims @ThePlooshies who have experienced a similar situation, please feel free to contact me.
Web3 is still full of interesting experiences, for better or worse. 🙂
• January 15, 2025 Investment completed in $CUDDLE
• April 1, 2025 Requested an update Reply : “We will provide an update soon.”
• August 22, 2025 Requested an update → No response
• September 2, 2025 Requested an update → No response
• September 3, 2025 Reply : “Please be assured that we are doing our best to deliver a satisfactory outcome for all investors. The token launch date has been confirmed as either December 25 or January 26. Until then, we will provide regular updates at least every 2–3 weeks.”
I did not pressure or rush him at any point. I waited until January 26, 2026, the date he mentioned. On the day of that final promised date, I was the one who reached out "first". The only thing I received in return was a single PDF.
I do not blame them if the token price drops or even if the launch ultimately fails. I accepted those risks when I chose to invest.
What made me completely lose trust in this project was the lack of respect shown toward its investors. Even the regular updates that were promised every 2–3 weeks were never delivered, not even once, even after a full year.
Without basic communication and accountability, what can a project realistically achieve in Web3?
At the very least, if he had reached out before January 26, acknowledged the delay, apologized, and shared a transparent update on the project’s status, I would have been willing to wait longer and continue supporting him. https://x.com/eth_apple/status/2104111644498612331
## @0xGaCrypto (Gà Crypto 🐳) · 09-27 03:56 · ♥50 ↻1 💬52 The interesting part of @PlayOnMint isn’t the number of things you can do
It’s the fact that your activity can actually compound
Gaming, predictions, NFTs, XP, leaderboards and rewards usually exist in separate loops. You play, earn, build reputation then move to another platform and start over
PlayOnMint is building around a different idea:
One MINT account One connected activity layer One progression system And the latest NucleusCodes campaign makes that model more interesting: $50,000 in $MNTD → Top 300 contributors 1,170 GTD MintABear spots → Reputation Leaderboard
So there are really two signals being tracked:
Contribution → what you create now Reputation → what you’ve already built That matters because MintABear isn’t just another isolated NFT drop.
It sits inside a broader system where activity can turn into XP, status, identity and eventually rewards.
Traditional Web3: activity → fragmented platforms → fragmented reputation PlayOnMint: activity → XP → status → identity → reward
And with MintABear coming to Robinhood Chain in the next few weeks, the ecosystem gets another interesting layer
The bigger question isn’t whether Web3 needs another entertainment platform It’s whether activity itself can become portable capital
Dont misss https://x.com/0xGaCrypto/status/2104057644445307010
## @nifercheks (Abundance) · 09-27 06:40 · ♥52 ↻3 💬34 When I don finally ready to go irl event
If anybody drag me na God go take am for me, in fact you will hear from my lawyers > 引用 @nifercheks: A 1,111 collection on Robinhood named Anthood
So I got creative and made a fan art for the collection @KingAnt
We keep building strong 💪 https://t.co/XofyIhkFqj https://x.com/nifercheks/status/2104098745793048927
## @fourtislisting (Fourtis Listing Alert) · 09-27 08:18 · ♥58 ↻9 💬10 Fourtis New Listing ⚡
DIAMOND Trend Now! 🥇
LOCKFI ( #LOCKFI ) @lockfiorg https://t.co/OYtCewomFH
CA: 0x2cc477fb4fb0e63ccf5a3673c1628edc1007b734
PRICE: $0.0000128676 | MC: $12,867.63
#Fourtis #Newlisting #Altcoin #Memecoin #FourtisListing #Dyor https://t.co/xk3xZ1gKvy https://x.com/fourtislisting/status/2104123579520389386
## @ice_bearcute (icey) · 09-27 03:52 · ♥52 ↻0 💬26 been following @DripsterNFT for a long time and team keeps delivering
every piece is hand-drawn, you can feel the details. no AI slop here
now 4444 of them coming to robinhood
fill the form to secure your spot: https://t.co/pAl0l3HvCF
locked in. drip szn > 引用 @DripsterNFT: Serving looks.
4444 of whatever it is coming to @RobinhoodApp
Reserve your seat: https://t.co/ALKJOM89Gh https://t.co/CW3XBdPVZk https://x.com/ice_bearcute/status/2104056441690849580
## @ktrap (Ktrap) · 09-27 04:53 · ♥54 ↻9 💬4 CREDITS DAILY #4 • Sept 27
The floor rebounded, rare shelves repriced
▷ MARKET
Floor: 0.0262Ξ (~$71), up 14.4%
9,096 unique CREDITS listed, down 334
That’s 7.45% of the 122,154-piece edition
2,498 unique sellers, down 131
339 listings sit within 10% of floor, 857 within 25%
The floor recovered while listed supply tightened, but immediate depth grew around the new floor
▷ OFFICIAL RATING FLOORS
Top 100: 0.4Ξ (~$1,079) +122.3% Top 1,000: 0.075Ξ (~$202) +29.3% Top 1%: 0.06Ξ (~$162) +57.9% Top 5%: 0.0295Ξ (~$80) +0.3% Top 10%: 0.0277Ξ (~$75) +6.5%
▷ COLLECTOR FLOORS
2 Eights: 0.0359Ξ (~$97) 3 Eights: 0.195Ξ (~$526) 4 Eights: 1.83Ξ (~$4,934) Extreme Weight: 0.03Ξ (~$81) Loose Print: 0.03834Ξ (~$103)
Loose Print rose 30.1% while Extreme Weight fell 14.3%, a useful reminder that collector sectors can separate even when the collection floor rises
▷ CREDITSTRATEGY CUSTODY
The third-party TokenWorks CreditStrategy now holds 6,306 CREDITS, up 1,532
That’s 5.16% of the edition under one contract address
Raw holder wallets fell by 257 to 15,588, but pooled strategy custody makes that a poor proxy for 257 collectors leaving
This is TokenWorks CREDITSTR, not Nosh’s separate Robinhood Chain $CSTR buy-and-airdrop system, and neither are part of Jack’s official mechanics
▷ STATEMENT WATCH
Excluding CreditStrategy:
246 wallets hold 80+ CREDITS, up 5
9 crossed 80+ while four fell below
A further 320 wallets hold 50–79 CREDITS
They collectively hold 17,666 CREDITS and may be working toward the 80-CREDIT threshold, though balances alone cannot confirm intent
The 246 wallets above 80 represent a minimum of 19,680 CREDITS
Their actual combined holdings are 34,260 CREDITS, up 244
That’s 28.05% of the edition
Theoretical Statement capacity: 368, up 4
That represents 29,440 CREDITS, or 24.10% of supply
The 80+ count means wallets capable of at least one Statement, not total capacity and not intent to burn
▷ OCTOBER 1
Jack posted four image-only grid compositions
The images add context, but they do not yet confirm the assembly interface, arrangement rules, metadata inheritance or how Statement ratings will work
October 1 is four calendar days from this snapshot, but no opening hour or timezone has been announced
The floor rebounded & rare shelves repriced before the full mechanic was explained
That doesn’t guarantee the move continues, but it makes the next official reveal worth watching closely
Data snapshot: Sep 27, 04:27 UTC ETH reference: $2,696.35
NFA; Have fun collecting CREDITS https://x.com/ktrap/status/2104072034082795527