# Robinhood Chain — X 热门讨论 (2026-10-10 09:38 UTC)
## @olldrops (「cohn」 ✦) · 10-10 08:45 · ♥76 ↻34 💬46 spent some time going through the mintabear section on the @PlayOnMint side
you pick up one of the 4,444 bears and spend $mntd to push it into a higher tier
half that spend gets burned on the spot → permanently out of circulation the remaining half goes straight to the protocol
higher tier means the bear carries more weight when the rewards pool gets divided so the cut you receive from whatever sits in that pool grows with it
catch is → transfer the bear to any other wallet and the tier resets completely the upgrade does not stick to the nft at all even sending it back to the same wallet later still starts it from zero again
makes you wonder if the design really favours pure long term holders over people who might move them around
@PlayOnMint confirms the burn is final the moment the transaction goes through
whitepaper has the full cumulative $mntd table listed → tier 0 sits at 1,666 → tier 1 sits at 3,333 → tier 2 sits at 8,333 → tier 3 sits at 16,666 → tier 4 sits at 41,666
weights climb from 1.00 all the way to 2.00 at the top level
right now whitepaper is out, tge pointed at 20 october, robinhood chain mint getting nearer, and the actual tier upgrade function stays locked until the security check wraps up > 引用 @PlayOnMint: The next chapter of MINT starts here 🔥
Our whitepaper is now live. Get a closer look at the vision behind Mint and where we’re heading ⚡
Dig in 👇
https://t.co/3NdpjzHz5T https://t.co/FqT3IpiJSB https://x.com/olldrops/status/2108841266012450883
## @only_oneayomide (𝕬𝖞𝖔𝖒𝖎𝖉𝖊) · 10-10 08:05 · ♥57 ↻30 💬6 An exam where the marking scheme is published before anyone sits it is not cheating.
Rally's Permissionless Campaigns work like that. The screenshot under this is the scheme being written.
Crypto's distribution problem is rarely a shortage of writers. Nobody knows what a project pays for until after the work.
@RallyOnChain, the first decentralized marketing protocol, puts that decision in a form anyone can fill in.
Page one asks who runs the campaign. It took my handle with no company behind it.
Three boxes follow: what the project is, the voice and what is off-limits, and the rules. A post that breaks one rule scores zero.
The boxes are locked at launch. Creators and the reviewer read the same text, so nobody is marked against a secret.
Money waits in escrow and is split by score. The form never asks how many followers you have.
Robinhood Chain projects run it in their own tokens.
Say it under this. In your own rules box, what is the one rule a post should score zero for? https://x.com/only_oneayomide/status/2108831270264263074
## @0x_Sultan26 (SULTAN) · 10-10 08:58 · ♥51 ↻2 💬52 The @PlayOnMint whitepaper is live, and it finally puts hard numbers on paper instead of vibes.
TGE target is 20 October. Reference price listed at $0.033 per $MNTD. Fixed supply of 1 billion, ERC-20 on Robinhood Chain, and no public sale, which means the Season 1 grind and the airdrop are the actual ways in, not a last-minute buy.
That last point reframes the whole season. If there’s no public sale, then the XP you stacked and the Bear you held weren’t just engagement farming. They were the allocation mechanism. The date just turned the abstract into a countdown.
Eleven days out. Worth reading the doc yourself before the noise starts.
@PlayOnMint https://x.com/0x_Sultan26/status/2108844484633202993
## @HOTDOGonRH (Costco Hotdog (Parody)) · 10-10 05:31 · ♥59 ↻11 💬15 Bullish on Robinhood chain 🌭 https://t.co/bZAoChMLDA > 引用 @vladtenev: Choosing where to build is a big decision. You're putting your time and your reputation behind it. To everyone who chose Robinhood Chain in these first 100 days: thank you. I'm glad we get to build this together. https://x.com/HOTDOGonRH/status/2108792484134629857