# Robinhood Chain DEX volume — X 热门讨论 (2026-09-30 11:31 UTC)
## @Tanaka_L2 (Tanaka) · 09-30 07:39 · ♥132 ↻3 💬29 Looking at Robinhood right now, I still think this is a cooldown before another meme wave, rather than the end of the trend.
Onchain activity is still pretty strong:
– 8.47M txs in 24H – $1.40B DEX volume/24H – 162.7K active wallets/24H – 13K+ new tokens launched daily across major launchpads
Launchpad activity is also heavily concentrated:
– @ponsdotfamily: 7,351 launches/24H – @flapdotsh: 3,843 – @longdotxyz : 1,753
These 3 account for ~96% of launches among the top 10 launchpads shown on Dune.
Ofc, meme activity has cooled quite a bit from the early-Sep peak.
Daily launchpad token volume dropped from $1.3B+ to around $350-400M, while daily new token launches fell from ~30-40K at peak to 13K+ now.
But IMO, this is still a solid level of activity for an ecosystem that only started attracting serious meme liquidity a few months ago.
Liquidity could become increasingly concentrated around a few launchpads and memes with strong communities, especially with stock-paired memes and tokenized stocks continuing to grow on Robinhood.
For the next meme cycle, I'm mainly watching Solana and Robinhood Chain.
If you're not good at hunting individual memes, another way to get exposure to this narrative is through launchpad tokens that already have real activity and market share.
$PONS @ponsfamily currently #1 by new token launches on Robinhood
Personally, $PONS is still on my watchlist for another Robinhood meme wave.
Robinhood memes have cooled down, but the activity is still there. > 引用 @Tanaka_L2: I just bought $PONS.
If you’ve been watching Robinhood Chain lately, the launchpad war is heating up fast, especially between @ponsdotfamily and @TradePools by @Uniswap.
Personally, I’m leaning toward PONS here for a few reasons:
[1] Better economics for creators
This is probably the biggest one for me.
On Pons, creators can capture 0.7% from trading activity, while Pools allows an optional creator cut of up to 0.05%.
At the same $1M volume, that difference can be significant.
And in a launchpad business, I think attracting good creators first matters a lot. Traders usually follow where the attention and good tokens are.
[2] $PONS already has a working token flywheel
Pons isn’t just a launchpad with a token attached.
Part of the protocol economics flows back into $PONS through buybacks/burns, so growing platform activity can translate into value accrual for the token.
That makes $PONS more interesting to me than simply betting on launchpad volume.
[3] Pons already built its position before Uniswap entered
@TradePools obviously has the stronger brand and distribution.
But Pons already had users, creators and mindshare on Robinhood Chain before Pools arrived.
The fact that Uniswap entered this market also tells me something else: the launchpad vertical on Robinhood Chain is becoming important enough to fight for.
[4] Robinhood listing angle
This is the speculative part of my thesis.
I have no idea whether $PONS will actually be one of the next Robinhood Spot listings.
But when I look across the current Robinhood Chain tokens, I think $PONS is one of the names with a noticeable case: a real product, existing activity, strong ecosystem relevance and now a clear competitive narrative.
So I bought some.
TradePools may win on brand and cheaper trading.
But right now, I think $PONS has the more interesting token thesis.
Let’s see what real volume decides.
NFA. https://x.com/Tanaka_L2/status/2105200810850439318