# Bitcoin — X 热门讨论 (2026-10-08 17:20 UTC)
## @Darky1k (Darky) · 10-08 15:59 · ♥462 ↻23 💬39 Happy 10/10
Never trust Binance https://t.co/y7UmAoUg6o https://x.com/Darky1k/status/2108225708195754038
## @GoMining (GoMining) · 10-08 14:00 · ♥324 ↻65 💬19 In 2008, Satoshi called bitcoin a peer-to-peer electronic cash system.
Cash. Money you spend. Today most of it just sits in a wallet instead.
We're building something to change that, and it won't run through banks or middlemen. It'll run through bitcoiners.
We're looking for the most committed to launch it with us: a direct line to the team, a hands-on role, and pioneer status that stays with you. We'll select 20+. https://x.com/GoMining/status/2108195849214026103
## @Barchart (Barchart) · 10-08 16:03 · ♥345 ↻36 💬36 BREAKING : Bitcoin $BTC
Timberrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr https://t.co/wYDd1NeJQY https://x.com/Barchart/status/2108226683660595550
## @BritishHodl (BRITISH HODL) · 10-08 15:31 · ♥377 ↻10 💬42 Just heard from one guy in the UAE who switched $7m of Bitcoin from spot to IBIT after the cold card fiasco.
He's selling weekly - way out of the money - IBIT call options now.
Went from $0 income from his Bitcoin, to roughly $300,000 a year aiming for 4% annual premium with the intention of not getting called away.
$7m in Bitcoin, $300k a year tax free income.
How about that. https://x.com/BritishHodl/status/2108218624460648828
## @cryptoskullx (CryptoSkull 💀 ze last bull standing) · 10-08 15:56 · ♥318 ↻29 💬11 You might have seen another round of $BTC and crypto FUD on your timeline once again.
I can tell you that this FUD is BS once again.
And just like with the quantum FUD, I expect another big name, likely a blockchain dev, to clear things up very soon, just like the AVAX founder did with the quantum narrative.
The quantum FUD didn’t work, so now they’re trying the SI FUD, which is an even bigger joke.
Right now we’re being told that “long-term” holders are selling.
To me, this looks like nothing more than MM social engineering, using fear to fabricate yet another dip.
Long-term holders, and we’re talking about decade-old wallets here, don’t suddenly change their minds five days into what I believe is the biggest bull market.
Meanwhile, a new wave of participants is buying.
Strange, no?
You can look at the data on Coinglass and plenty of other services yourself.
But with SI, I expect the social engineering and manipulation attempts to get even bigger.
Never forget what you believed in and what foundation you built your conviction on when you first entered this market.
This post is your reminder.
“IF” Bitcoin is in a bull market, the answer to all this FUD will be a violent candle above 90k.
And Skully says we are.
My friends,
I’ve said it countless times.
As long as powerful players like CZ, Binance and the Trump administration continue to wield influence over this asset class, I believe crypto will remain prone to manipulation bigly.
However, I believe that in 2027 $BTC will become so big that even these players will taste their own medicine.
Every attempt to manipulate it will eventually get outpriced by the sheer amount of capital entering the market.
Lock in, max bidding here 🫡 https://x.com/cryptoskullx/status/2108225039434752128
## @CryptoMichNL (Michaël van de Poppe) · 10-08 13:57 · ♥303 ↻15 💬43 I've said this before, but this is the area where you'd want to become interested into buying #Bitcoin.
Quite an organic correction on the markets and therefore retesting the previous zone of consolidation. https://t.co/eD5EH8AJbk https://x.com/CryptoMichNL/status/2108194958297743620
## @eliz883 (EliZ) · 10-08 15:27 · ♥317 ↻9 💬35 Good analysis, $BTC
Waiting was a great example https://t.co/uVCPRruDWt > 引用 @eliz883: Well, $BTC has almost reached the zone I had indicated.
I won’t be entering the market straight away: at these levels, the risk is still too high. Losing this support could quickly send us towards the 75–76K area.
I need to see consolidation at the lows, followed by a reclaim of a key level within the range. Only then will I consider entering.
For now, I’m waiting https://x.com/eliz883/status/2108217709204816099
## @CobaltHarbor (Cobalt Harbor) · 10-08 15:39 · ♥320 ↻0 💬18 Against the backdrop of frequent derivatives liquidations and cascading liquidations, the monthly final figures give a real picture: $3.49 billion in net inflow into Bitcoin ETFs and +11% to the sector's market cap.
As the head of Binance notes, fundamental demand for digital assets remains high despite local volatility.
What currently serves as your main reference point — monthly institutional inflows into ETFs or short-term price movements in the order book? > 引用 @Cointelegraph: 🔥 BULLISH: Richard Teng says crypto demand held firm in September as market cap rose 11% and $BTC ETFs drew $3.49B. https://t.co/QZmducPLaR https://x.com/CobaltHarbor/status/2108220632802492637