# Robinhood Chain — X 热门讨论 (2026-09-24 10:40 UTC)
## @ItzAbcrypto (ABDUL) · 09-24 02:51 · ♥68 ↻4 💬81 GM gMint ☕
One thing I watch for with gaming NFTs is what happens after the mint. If the NFT isn't connected to the product, it can quickly become just another collectible.
MintABear is designed differently. Its role comes from the activity inside @PlayOnMint , where players can earn XP through the platform and that progression can connect to qualifying for a Bear.
The collection has 4,444 NFTs and the mint is free on Robinhood Chain. Some Bears are allocated for MINT casino, sportsbook, and live table activity, while others go through selected communities.
After minting, the Bear can connect to mystery box raffles and secondary market royalties paid in ETH and $MNTD. Players can also burn $MNTD to move a Bear from Level 1 to Level 5, with higher levels receiving more royalty weight and stronger Status benefits.
Then there is the wider $MNTD system. Players can stake the token and progress through seven MINT Status levels, creating another layer of rewards and platform benefits.
So I would not look at MintABear as a standalone NFT. It is more like an extension of the platform’s progression loop:
Play → XP → $MNTD → Stake → Status → Bear utility.
That connection gives the NFT a practical role inside the ecosystem rather than leaving it as something you simply mint and hold. https://x.com/ItzAbcrypto/status/2102954091831796058
## @0xmim9 (𝐌𝐈𝐌 ♡) · 09-24 04:00 · ♥60 ↻3 💬72 gSlippy guys ❤️
Most meme projects start with a token @Slippyclub
@Slippyclub starts with a character.
One snake 12 personalities zero arms and somehow every version feels completely different.
What makes the NFT side interesting is that your Slippy isn’t just a PFP. Holders get personal and commercial IP rights tied to their character with potential revenue from merch licensing and collaborations.
robinhood:0xf0568863195770965a6d8abb0aa87f4314b80320 on Robinhood Chain.
One snake Twelve lives 🐍 https://x.com/0xmim9/status/2102971289359299052
## @Web3stunner_ (ifycalex) · 09-24 06:58 · ♥63 ↻9 💬37 Good Morning and Happy Thursday Everyone ❣️❣️
NFT Lovers, CyberThrone is an 8,888 supply NFT collection built around handcrafted robot art, digital content, IP rights and a broader Web3 ecosystem.
@0xCyberThrone is taking the collection multichain through @Unvault, powered by LayerZero.
Minters can choose where to mint across supported chains including Ethereum, Robinhood Chain, Abstract and Base, while also being able to move their NFTs between supported networks.
One collection, multiple blockchains, with the choice in the holder’s hands. I’m very bullish on this one. https://x.com/Web3stunner_/status/2103016243426943195
## @Mohitt_NFT (𝖬ohit 🥤) · 09-24 09:01 · ♥67 ↻0 💬21 Sometimes FOMO takes you somewhere you didn’t expect
That’s what I liked about @fomoater
It’s a collection of 3,333 characters inspired by FOMO, internet culture and simple everyday curiosity
Collection Details
Mint Price : Free Chain : Robinhood Mint Date : TBA
They’re also planning comics, short animations and fun stories around the characters
Let’s see where this little ant takes us https://x.com/Mohitt_NFT/status/2103047173256712620
## @DayTradeKade (Futures Sniper) · 09-24 05:04 · ♥66 ↻4 💬10 🚨 Another $WALLET piece just clicked for me.
I’ve seen this argument probably 100 times now: “If $WALLET was actually Robinhood, the money aa33 is making from fees would’ve shown up in earnings. It didn’t. Theory over.”
I thought that was a fair argument, until I actually lined up the dates.
Robinhood’s Q2 ended June 30. Robinhood Chain went live July 1. Literally the next day.
Then on July 10, aa33 launched $WALLET.
Something important we have talked about previously; aa33 does not make money from owning a bag of $WALLET. Aa33 makes money through volume and fees.
When people trade $WALLET through its liquidity pool, the pool charges a fee on those swaps. Part of those collected fees gets distributed back to aa33 as the creator/deployer beneficiary.
It is all verifiable on-chain.
For example: On July 10 the $WALLET/WETH LP collected 0.335078 WETH in fees. Of that, 0.117277 WETH was sent directly to aa33.
35% of the WETH fees from that collection went to aa33.
That’s actual income from trading activity. Robinhood would legally need to report this if aa33 were their wallet.
Now go back to the earnings argument.
Robinhood reported earnings July 29, which is why people keep saying, “Well where was this revenue?”
I completely overlooked this at first too.
Those were Q2 earnings.
Q2 covered April 1 through June 30.
$WALLET didn’t even exist until July 10.
So how exactly would July $WALLET fees have been included in revenue for a quarter that ended 10 days before the token launched?
They wouldn’t.
“But the revenue wasn’t in Robinhood’s July earnings” is not the smoking gun people think it is.
If aa33/$WALLET ultimately turns out to be controlled by or economically tied to Robinhood, then the post-June 30 economics belong to a later reporting period and would have to be accounted for accordingly.
Just look at the dates:
Q2 closes: June 30 Robinhood Chain: July 1 $WALLET launches: July 10 aa33 starts receiving $WALLET LP fees: July 10 Q2 earnings call: July 29
If your argument against $WALLET has been “Robinhood already reported earnings and the revenue wasn’t there”…
you’ve been looking at the wrong quarter.
The earnings period that actually includes $WALLET’s trading activity hasn’t been reported yet.
Make of it what you will. 🐇 https://x.com/DayTradeKade/status/2102987614605521131