# Robinhood Chain — X 热门讨论 (2026-10-02 06:34 UTC)
## @01_Mkay (😈MKÃŶ💫 | Trade Gold 24/7 on Vantage) · 10-02 05:08 · ♥67 ↻3 💬67 Rally just landed on Robinhood Chain, and the first thing I wanted was not another launch tweet.
A friend sent me the Robinhood Earn number and asked where it comes from. I had the rate. I did not have the sentence. The deposits sit with @Morpho, get lent to borrowers posting collateral from Spark, Ethena, and Maple, and the interest is what pays the yield. That is one line. Most people repeating the rate have never heard it.
That is the project I want on Rally next. It already has the deposits. What it does not have is a crowd that can say where the yield comes from without reading a thread first. A campaign paid in its own token would force that sentence into the open.
Before you name a project, check it is actually building on the chain. Rally and Robinhood do not count.
If a Hood project can pay creators to explain it, should the first campaign cover where the yield comes from, or who is even allowed to use it? > 引用 @RallyOnChain: RALLY IS LIVE ON ROBINHOOD CHAIN 🚨
Robinhood built an AI-native chain, so we brought the AI-native attention layer to it.
Starting today, any project on @RobinhoodCrypto can fund a Rally campaign with its own token and put 150K+ creators to work on its story.
Welcome 💚 https://t.co/FkWc6rbgAe https://x.com/01_Mkay/status/2105887746011148623
## @cuemnee (JENNY ) · 10-02 04:47 · ♥43 ↻3 💬53 Rally just landed on Robinhood Chain.
The next project I want to see run a campaign here is @ProjectVEXai.
What makes VEX interesting to me is not simply that an AI agent can execute onchain. It is the way VEX keeps the user in control while giving the agent room to actually do useful work.
The wallet stays on your machine, and fund moving actions still go through your approval. VEX is already bringing trading and other onchain execution to Robinhood Chain, so there is a real product for creators to dig into.
That makes this a good Rally fit.
Instead of another campaign full of AI agent posts, I’d rather see creators explain what VEX can actually do, where the approval layer matters, and what self custody looks like when software is doing more of the work.
That is a story worth making people understand, not just advertise. > 引用 @RallyOnChain: RALLY IS LIVE ON ROBINHOOD CHAIN 🚨
Robinhood built an AI-native chain, so we brought the AI-native attention layer to it.
Starting today, any project on @RobinhoodCrypto can fund a Rally campaign with its own token and put 150K+ creators to work on its story.
Welcome 💚 https://t.co/FkWc6rbgAe https://x.com/cuemnee/status/2105882225380323671
## @goon_crypto (「 𝕲𝖔𝖔𝖓」) · 10-02 03:07 · ♥41 ↻6 💬7 100% agree here. all the teasing landing right before the hood summit had people expecting a reveal that would send us to valhalla
instead we got $TIBBIR base to robinhood chain bridge. the tourists dumped the chart and the rest piled on.
but the bridge was never the reveal. it's step one: > " $TIBBIR was built for real world assets" and rh chain is the rwa chain > a 1% TibbirHook fee split 70/30, and nobody has explained the 70% wallet yet > bigger holders adding into the dip instead of leaving > i think that most $TIBBIR liquidity still needs to cross over to rh before the next phase starts. so if you havent bridged. do it now
my read: the real reveal comes after the liquidity moves, not before
added to my bags as well. comfy hold > 引用 @cryptolimbo: The bridge was real.
The market just priced in a much bigger reveal than what actually arrived.
For ~2 weeks, @ribbita2012 kept dropping coded posts that the community decoded into a bridge. With Robinhood Summit approaching, people naturally started assuming the bridge completion would lead to some major Ribbit/TIBBIR reveal.
$TIBBIR broke ATHs on that expectation.
Then the bridge completed and the reveal was simply:
TIBBIR → Robinhood Chain.
No huge Summit reveal, so the 40%+ unwind made sense. A lot of the move was hype, FOMO and expectations getting ahead of reality.
But I don’t think the story ends there.
The most interesting line from $TIBBIR was:
“TIBBIR was built for real world assets.”
Then community research found a 1% buy/sell fee through a Uniswap v4 TibbirHook, apparently split 70/30, with the 30% side potentially linked to people around Windward Labs / NODE. The purpose of the 70% wallet is still unknown.
So for me it’s pretty simple now:
If we start getting fresh Ribbit breadcrumbs, clearer RWA direction, more details around the actual product development, the story keeps progressing.
If the Robinhood bridge was the entire reveal after all that teasing, then the market probably needs to cool off and reset before the next leg.
That isn’t bearish.
That’s just separating what we know from what the market was hoping for.
One thing worth watching: community tracking suggests some of the larger holders have been adding into the weakness rather than leaving.
Maybe that’s simply conviction.
Maybe they see something the rest of us don’t yet.
Either way, my thesis hasn’t changed.
I still think $TIBBIR has one of the more interesting setups in this market.
I’m just no longer trading the bridge.
I’m waiting to see what they build on the other side of it. https://x.com/goon_crypto/status/2105857247243026461
## @capitaldeployer (capital deployer) · 10-02 04:24 · ♥46 ↻5 💬2 may a million LONGs prosper.
genuinely don't think we've ever seen this level of networked liquidity emerge from a protocol in such a decentralized way. both on the human/community side as well as the financial/onchain side.
as liquidity begets liquidity, the ecosystems achieves more and more reflexivity, each community making the other stronger by contributing to the whole of the idea.
each memefi coin is like a node in the emerging rwa economy built on robinhood chain.
it's genuinely hard to imagine what this makes possible but it's inspiring to be a part of it.
it's worth an attempt. > 引用 @Natan_benish: This is probably one of the most important upgrades we’ve had with LONG.
And one of the purest forms of the “liquidity moat” I keep mentioning.
Very simple breakdown:
Stock pairs on LONG hold 10–40% of the entire stock circulating supply and are the main reason some stocks on RH are liquid.
They can accumulate substantial liquidity and market fees in their vaults ($1m+ now).
They can now allocate these fees to LP positions in STOCK/USDG pools with no IL(impairment lose is huge problem I will break down later and explain how stock pair flows can solve)
This enables stock pairs to capture the entire routing layer around their stock, including the activity they drive themselves.
Accrue more LP fees back to the vault.
And own an even bigger share of the liquidity and upside from growth in RWA TVL and activity.
I’d take this a step further. I strongly believe that, with multiple iterations, this can be an endgame for tokenized stock LP.
I’d even argue that this is an ideal way for capital allocators to incentivize stock pairs, add liquidity to STOCK/USDG pools, and align with the biggest stock pairs by routing a portion of LP fees back to them.
working to roll this out to more pairs as we speak. It’s permissionless, but requires some manual configuration we can’t automate.
LONG. https://x.com/capitaldeployer/status/2105876517356269957