# DeFi — X 热门讨论 (2026-09-20 10:37 UTC)
## @DeltixCoreTeam (Deltix Core Team) · 09-20 01:02 · ♥73 ↻31 💬19 🚨 WELCOME $wDLTX ◆
The next chapter of the Deltix ecosystem has officially begun.
$wDLTX is now on BNB Smart Chain.
📜 Official Contract Address:
0xb239AE27C34235D329C56aF20ca91186b4564c3B
⚠️ IMPORTANT: Always verify the contract address before swapping or adding the token to your wallet. Do not trust contract addresses posted by unofficial accounts.
◆ $DLTX — Native Deltix Layer-1 coin ◆ $wDLTX — Wrapped token on BNB Smart Chain
Welcome, $wDLTX. 🔥
#Deltix #DLTX #wDLTX #BNBChain #BSC #DeFi https://x.com/DeltixCoreTeam/status/2101477098078822675
## @DucCryptoX (Duc Crypto) · 09-20 03:10 · ♥75 ↻2 💬71 $ENA rớt nhẹ sau khi chạm đỉnh, nhưng cấu trúc tăng vẫn còn nguyên.
Điểm đáng chú ý ở Ethena lúc này là cơ chế fee switch vừa được đề xuất. Khi cung USDe đạt mốc quy định, khoảng 95% doanh thu ròng từ 3 mảng cốt lõi sẽ dùng để mua lại ENA. Nếu thực thi đúng như đề xuất thì đây là một cấu trúc khá hiếm trong DeFi, nhưng vẫn cần chờ được thông qua và chạy thật trên mainnet.
USDe hiện tích hợp trên hơn 100 nền tảng, gồm Robinhood, Coinbase, Binance và BlackRock Aladdin, cho thấy phạm vi sử dụng đã vượt ra ngoài DeFi thuần túy. Ethena Pay cũng vừa live trên iOS ở khoảng 50 quốc gia, mở thêm một use case mới ngoài trading.
Doanh thu quý gần nhất vẫn đang giảm dần so với quý 1, nên lực mua lại từ 95% doanh thu ròng cũng sẽ nhỏ theo nếu xu hướng này tiếp diễn. Đây là điểm cần theo dõi thêm, không phải chi tiết để bỏ qua khi đánh giá cơ chế mới này. https://x.com/DucCryptoX/status/2101509261214064660
## @Defi_Insider_1 (Defi Insider) · 09-19 22:24 · ♥73 ↻0 💬55 Just applied for the hunter's list.
The legends are true!
Time to hunt some @BITFOOTS_ https://t.co/JJmrBiC3Hk https://t.co/jdD94woYiO https://x.com/Defi_Insider_1/status/2101437207265374265
## @Defi_Warhol (DeFi Warhol) · 09-20 08:15 · ♥72 ↻0 💬21 I thought it would be fun to give you a list of some of the senators who voted no on advancing CLARITY and why they did.
→ @SenBooker | Said the ethics rules didn't go far enough to stop Trump from profiting from his crypto businesses.
→ @SenCortezMasto | Raised concerns about crypto crime enforcement, ethics, and prediction markets bypassing state and Tribal gambling laws.
→ @SenatorSlotkin | Wanted stronger ethics and anti-money-laundering safeguards, plus enough staff and oversight at the agencies enforcing the rules.
→ @SenWarren | Argued the bill lacked adequate protections against political self-dealing, investor harm, and illicit finance.
→ @SenThomTillis | Switched from yes to no to preserve the option of bringing the vote back. He still supports moving CLARITY forward.
What I find interesting is that these weren’t all the same reasons, and Tillis’s vote shows why the tally alone doesn’t tell the whole story.
I’m really rooting for this to pass, and I know many of you are too and I don’t think this is the end for the CLARITY Act. > 引用 @SenThomTillis: This is not the end for the Clarity Act. We've made substantial bipartisan progress in large part because of the White House. This procedural motion allows us to continue working towards a positive outcome. https://x.com/Defi_Warhol/status/2101585908281835814