# Robinhood Chain liquidity — X 热门讨论 (2026-09-21 09:42 UTC)
## @PrincipiaLabs_ (Principia Labs) · 09-21 07:42 · ♥203 ↻1 💬1 OnChain IPO: How Binance will exchange the world https://x.com/PrincipiaLabs_/status/2101940099495719371
## @elevek (elev.eth) · 09-20 09:11 · ♥73 ↻35 💬18 $25B in cumulative DEX volume is the before/after line.
Before $25B: Robinhood Chain was a distribution story. Existing retail accounts, familiar interface, low friction entry.
After $25B: it is a liquidity story. Protocols are pricing in the flow. Builders are following the volume.
The catch: DEX volume can be rented. Assets under custody cannot. That delta, what users actually hold versus what they route through, is the number that separates a trading venue from a real financial network. https://x.com/elevek/status/2101600100300562668
## @RobinhoodHub (Robinhood Hub) · 09-21 01:07 · ♥79 ↻25 💬27 🔎 New launchpad coming to Robinhood.
More safe than all the other ones and will steal a lot of volume from all the other launchpads.
■ Automatic liquidity burn ■ Multi-chain integration ■ Better UI
This is not just a normal launchpad, chainlink is also involved so they will push it.
@DegenGamesVIP https://x.com/RobinhoodHub/status/2101840611339047378
## @CohassetRey (Cohasset) · 09-21 01:17 · ♥72 ↻10 💬7 robinhood:0x39dbed3a2bd333467115de45665cc57f813c4571 IS NOT JUST LAUNCHING MEMES ANYMORE.
I think people are still looking at @ponsdotfamily like it’s another Pumpfun.
V2 is turning it into something much broader.
You can now launch against:
> ETH > USDG > cbBTC > tokenized stocks > ETFs > RWAs like gold
And the pair actually matters.
Launch against $NVDA and the entire market is priced in NVDA.
Trading fees are earned in NVDA.
After graduation, liquidity moves into the corresponding Uniswap V4 market.
Same idea with $SPY, $QQQ, $AAPL, $TSLA, BTC or USDG.
There are already 50+ tokenized assets approved as Pons quote assets.
So the bigger robinhood:0x39dbed3a2bd333467115de45665cc57f813c4571 thesis isn’t “the best memecoin launchpad on Robinhood.”
It’s becoming a permissionless market creation layer for whatever assets Robinhood Chain puts onchain.
Memes were just the first use case. > 引用 @byTheGentleman: Pumpfun won the users, but Pons is trying to win the creators: $PUMP vs robinhood:0x39dbed3a2bd333467115de45665cc57f813c4571
One of the craziest robinhood:0x39dbed3a2bd333467115de45665cc57f813c4571 numbers isn't volume.
It's creator payouts.
@ponsdotfamily creators have already earned $104M+.
And the model gives them a reason to stay.
Current launches send 70% of the base trading fee to the creator and 30% to Pons.
V2 goes further.
> Launch against ETH - earn ETH. > Launch against USDG - earn USDG. > Launch against a tokenized stock - earn that stock.
A creator can literally launch against NVDA and get paid in NVDA as people trade.
There’s also an optional creator tax on top. That’s the moat I’m watching. The launch button itself is easy to copy.
Giving serious creators a reason to keep launching, building and earning on the same platform is much harder.
And Pons already has:
> $104M+ paid to creators > $10.6B+ traded > 645K+ tokens launched
Creators get paid. Pons takes its cut.
And 80% of the protocol share is currently routed into robinhood:0x39dbed3a2bd333467115de45665cc57f813c4571 buybacks + burns.
Pons doesn't need every meme to win.
It needs creators to keep coming back. https://x.com/CohassetRey/status/2101843180475814048