# Robinhood Chain — X 热门讨论 (2026-09-19 07:53 UTC)
## @RobinhoodAlphas (Robinhood Alpha) · 09-19 06:54 · ♥183 ↻110 💬45 $POOF — Uninstall Wizard
What if uninstalling was a meme?
$POOF is bringing the Uninstall Wizard to Robinhood Chain.
Simple concept. Strong meme potential. Early enough to watch closely.
C.A: 0x1615C7761f08Be4B52dB72ca461a24aC268a2415
Chart: https://t.co/hUiLXeemGg
DYOR & NFA https://x.com/RobinhoodAlphas/status/2101203284119720090
## @0xAmiii_ (Amii ⛩️) · 09-19 00:24 · ♥43 ↻25 💬35 Glad to announce i secured @screenfreakz collaboration for my communities.
Mint Details ⬇️ •Supply: 3333 •Mint Price: 0.0033 •Chain: Robinhood •Date: Sept 22
🤝Giving out x5 GTD Spots 🤝
➡️Like + Rt ➡️Tag a fren ➡️Comment evm wallet
Who wants a spot ? https://t.co/nuBGeOkMR2 https://x.com/0xAmiii_/status/2101104988504412621
## @jacek0x (Jacek) · 09-19 06:00 · ♥54 ↻6 💬37 How does $POOF help $DEGEN?
POOF’s main pool on Robinhood Chain is paired with DEGEN, giving traders a reason to use DEGEN too.
Today, DEGEN saw $1.2M+ in volume on RH, more than its DEX volume on Base.
POOF builds its community. DEGEN reaches new traders 🎩 https://x.com/jacek0x/status/2101189557396070425
## @whatalife598 (Degen) · 09-19 03:50 · ♥44 ↻5 💬10 $10 CASH just dropped on Robinhood Chain 👀
Phantom is giving eligible users $10 in CASH for doing just $25+ in qualifying trades/swaps on Robinhood Chain using phantom in-wallet swap feature.
→ Trade $25+ → Get $10 CASH → One wallet per person → First come, first served → Runs until Sept 29 or the reward pool runs out
The important part: $25+ volume for $10.
PS: Cash claim until the end of the campaign. https://x.com/whatalife598/status/2101156976952521014
## @fenix0x6 (fenix) · 09-19 03:26 · ♥40 ↻10 💬4 ok update here.
spent more time with $ASKR since the vet. still holds up.
WHAT I DID
› ran more models through it, not just the one test
› per-model pricing is real, charges match the quote, balance moves
› 316 in the picker with task filters and sort by cheapest
› team of three, been building since june. one crypto native, the rest are tech people
EVERYONE'S GOING TO COMPARE IT TO robinhood:0xaa07a0e9209e16ac99708c3ec70159c6ef3128a3 SO HERE'S THE DIFFERENCE
both are tokenized AI access on robinhood chain. that's where it stops.
› orbio: stake ORBIO, earn CREDIT, 1 credit = $1 of inference. tradeable, transferable, order book plus uniswap, arbitrage between them. built for agents to refuel themselves with no human in the loop
› askr: load crypto, get credits, use any model. no stake, no claim, no emission. the token gets you tiers
› orbio is a commodity. askr is a checkout counter
neither is wrong. they're different entry points to the same eventual thing.
WHY I THINK ASKR'S PATH IS THE WIDER ONE
› normal people are not going to stake a token to earn credits to talk to claude. they want one place, every model, cheaper, no subscription
› the emission layer is a crypto feature. useful for bootstrapping, invisible as a product benefit
› askr's whole pitch is a tool you use. the token is how you pay less for it
› and askr can add the tradeable credit later. it's step 9 on their published roadmap. going the other direction is harder, because you can't unwind an emission once it's in the path
WHAT I'M WATCHING
› x402 or accountless payment showing up in the changelog. that's the one that turns this into agent infrastructure instead of a consumer app
› holder band thresholds published
› depth. it's still thin and that's the actual risk, not the product, but for this stage, totally normal.
also, not knocking anyone. orbio is a real thing doing a different thing. i tested this one, it worked, and it looks better to me now than it did first go.
https://t.co/6jv9l7y5St > 引用 @fenix0x6: vetted $ASKR properly. i actually used it. it's real.
THE CONTRACT
› compared the bytecode byte-for-byte against a known pons template. 60 bytes differ, all of it name and symbol strings
› no owner, no mint, no fee switch, no tax. 1b fixed
› LP locked in the launcher contract, verified on sourcify
THE HOLDERS
› top holder isn't a holder, it's the lock. #2 is the airdrop contract. #3 is the uniswap v4 poolmanager
› that's 17.4% of "top 10 concentration" that nobody actually holds
› chased what looked like a bundle and it wasn't. the wallet feeding the fresh addresses is a router. 5,096 in, 5,096 out, identical totals, net zero
› one entity did buy 7.28% in the first minutes and split it across three wallets. open market, but it's there
THE PRODUCT
› pinged their api with no key. live json, correct auth-state detection, 364 models
› then made an account, loaded credits, got an api key, and ran it myself
› asked why removing liquidity after a sell doesn't move spot but market-selling the same tokens does. correct answer, named sqrtPriceX96, obeyed the constraint
› 2.1 credits. 3.4 seconds. receipted. balance moved
› 316 models in the picker with per-model pricing, task filters, sort by cheapest
POINTING TO BEING VERY LEGIT
› changelog says the product shipped in august. four workspace doors, video with pre-quoted pricing, the dev api, the CLI, per-key daily caps
› the token launch is one line in september, under a note about clip thumbnails
› the product came first and the token got added to it
WHAT IT MEANS
› revenue is switched off on purpose. fees don't turn on until they own the router and the payment processor
› the token is access, not yield. bands by share of supply, nothing to stake, nothing to claim
› product risk is answered. i paid for it and it worked
› what's left is five hours old with $172k of depth against a $2m cap. size to the pool
› what turns it from a trade into a position: holder bands published, depth that shrugs off 7%, fees on
https://t.co/FVdYUgmXJt https://x.com/fenix0x6/status/2101150849640890612