# Robinhood Chain — X 热门讨论 (2026-09-22 21:33 UTC)
## @CloudquestASIA (Cloud Quest) · 09-22 19:40 · ♥67 ↻46 💬90 Cloud Quest 🤝 @Bunnywtfnft
We are proud to announce this collaboration.
Supply: 3,000 Price: Free Chain: Robinhood Chain
Complete Quest Raffle 70 GTD 👇 https://t.co/5iNIqGRYgY https://t.co/oyvXg7rS0C https://x.com/CloudquestASIA/status/2102483206067106254
## @ClutchMarkets (StonkBrokers) · 09-22 21:19 · ♥101 ↻34 💬57 Building something unique with Stock Tokens on Robinhood Chain?
Engagement Low?
Watch This.
Clock In. https://t.co/7mKGfH8xss https://x.com/ClutchMarkets/status/2102508030298402863
## @alveejack1 (Ziadul Hasan) · 09-22 20:12 · ♥103 ↻0 💬109 DeBox : Turning Ownership Into a Social Layer https://x.com/alveejack1/status/2102491259374014647
## @pardotfamily (par) · 09-22 20:25 · ♥72 ↻19 💬20 9.45% of the total $par supply has been burned so far, all from fees! Every trade on par buys and burns more.
Small changelog of things we shipped quietly:
1) New stats page. A lot of you asked for more detail, so we rebuilt the whole section: daily volume, fees and payouts as charts, $par burns and buybacks over time, fee-mode breakdown, leaderboards by volume, creator fees and holder payouts, per-chain view, and a 7d / 30d / 90d / all-time switch
2) Robinhood Wallet is added in the wallet modal
3) Token avatars and links now follow the DexScreener profile, so CTOs can update branding without touching the contract
4) Holder rewards and creator earnings show USD totals, valued at the moment of each payout
5) "Creator earnings" in stats fixed: fees are now valued when collected, not at today's price
Many of you asked for this one, so go have a look and tell us what's missing: https://t.co/Q1d7mDAz6r
More soon, we won't stop cooking 👨🍳👨🍳 https://x.com/pardotfamily/status/2102494555039776958
## @chesus (CHESUS🧀) · 09-22 19:19 · ♥77 ↻12 💬20 Just sent @elonmusk to space to have a little chat with Tau Ceti. 🚀👽
Some people send messages.
We’re sending Elon.
Proof of Space is live. 🌎 → 🌌
It is already 85 Million miles from Earth, paid in $SPCX on Robinhood Chain.
https://t.co/ujSqJHiwrK https://t.co/5k5HT2cxvX https://x.com/chesus/status/2102477995210617041
## @stitchdegen (Stitch) · 09-22 20:11 · ♥63 ↻18 💬21 Another one I want to update is $DELTA
It just had a pretty crazy move, running from around $10–13M to nearly $30M MC before getting pulled back to the current range
But after this pump, I actually find DELTA more interesting than before
Not because the price went up
But because this time, the market has more things to price in beyond just the “liquidity layer of Robinhood Chain” narrative
The first thing is usage
DELTA now has around 22.6K positions, compared to just over 5K at the end of August. Total fees have also grown from around $495K to ~$3.75M
So in less than a month, positions have grown more than 4x while cumulative fees have increased more than 7x
This is probably the part I like most about this update
Attention can push a token from $10M to $30M very quickly, but it can't fake people actually using the product and consistently generating fees over time
The second thing is that DELTA is slowly becoming less dependent on meme volume on Robinhood Chain
Custom Pairs is probably the most interesting recent update for me
The team is expanding its liquidity infrastructure into tokenized stocks, commodities, and other assets
The timing makes sense considering how much of the Robinhood ecosystem is currently pushing the tokenized asset narrative
If these pools start generating real volume, DELTA could have another source of demand instead of simply waiting for PONS, CASHCAT, or the next Hood Chain meme to run
That’s what I’ll be watching over the next few weeks
The third thing is that the token is finally starting to have a clearer path to capture value from the product
The protocol currently takes 7.5% of LP fees, with 80% of that protocol revenue going toward buybacks and burns
I like the direction, but I still think it’s too early to call this a strong flywheel
Don’t look at the $3.75M in total fees and assume all of that is flowing back into $DELTA. It isn’t
What matters is whether this loop starts working :
usage => protocol revenue => buybacks => burns
If usage keeps growing while buybacks remain relatively small, then the token still isn’t capturing much of the value created by the product
And that’s also why I’m not getting overly bullish just because the chart pumped
TVL is still sitting around ~$1.2M
Fees and positions have expanded quickly, but TVL hasn’t really followed yet
If the Custom Pairs hype cools down while fees remain healthy, TVL holds up, and stock/RWA pools start contributing meaningful volume, I’ll view this move very differently
There’s also one major piece I’m still waiting for :
the native AMM
For me, this is the catalyst that could really change how the market looks at DELTA
Right now, they’re still building a lot around existing liquidity. If the native AMM goes live, the Router starts seeing real flow, and liquidity actually begins migrating into Delta’s own infrastructure, then the story becomes much more interesting
As for price, after a move to nearly $30M, I don’t think DELTA should be viewed as the same early low-cap bet anymore
The market has already repriced part of the thesis
After retracing back toward $17–18M, I’m more interested in whether it can establish a new range and keep attention after the initial pump fades
DELTA has already shown that it can attract users
The next test is much harder :
Can it turn users into liquidity, liquidity into revenue, and revenue into demand for $DELTA?
If it can, then the recent move might just be the first time the market has started looking at DELTA differently
If fees cool down together with meme volume while TVL stays flat, then this was still mostly another Robinhood Chain rotation
That’s what I’ll be watching from here, rather than simply waiting to see whether DELTA returns to its previous ATH
0xe8ffd7e24187F72afB08d75B1bb13088A989a791 > 引用 @stitchdegen: Gotta update you guys on $DELTA again, these numbers are getting pretty insane
Right now, Delta is sitting at roughly :
> $1.64M TVL > 5,119 positions > ~$495K total fees > ~$11–13M 24h volume on the $DELTA pair > ~$115K fees in the last 24h > 12K+ holders
For a protocol that’s still pretty early on Robinhood Chain, these aren’t numbers you can just ignore anymore
What I care about now isn’t really $DELTA sitting around ~$27M MC
The bigger question is :
Can usage continue scaling alongside the valuation? And so far, the answer seems to be leaning toward yes
5K+ positions, $1.6M+ TVL and nearly $500K in fees show that the liquidity infrastructure thesis is starting to have real data behind it, rather than just being a “Meteora of Robinhood” narrative
That said, I still wouldn’t call this product-market fit yet
$DELTA is getting a lot more attention now, so naturally some of that activity will flow into the product. What I want to see next is whether TVL, positions and fees can keep growing after the hype cools down
If they can, that would be much stronger validation
The next thing I’m watching closely is still the AMM
The current roadmap is :
Internal testing => closed testing => external audit => public launch
If the AMM launches smoothly and Delta can bring more of the liquidity stack in-house instead of relying on Uniswap, then the “Meteora of Robinhood” thesis starts moving from narrative toward execution
Attention is catching up too
$DELTA now has a 3x perp market on Aster DEX and is doing pretty serious daily volume. That’s a good catalyst for attention and liquidity, but I wouldn’t treat it as proof of adoption
Perps can bring volume to the token. Product usage is what I actually care about
And there’s still one thing I haven’t changed my mind about from the beginning :
Good protocol ≠ good token
TVL, positions and fees can all keep growing, but eventually $DELTA still needs a clear mechanism to capture value from protocol growth for token holders
The team has said future tokenomics will align the product with holders, but there’s still no concrete mechanism yet
That remains the biggest missing piece for me
Overall, the $DELTA thesis is getting more interesting because the product is actually being used and real numbers are starting to support the narrative
But at ~$27M MC, I also don’t see it as a cheap infrastructure bet anymore
From here, I want to see :
AMM live => audit completed => Router adoption => continued TVL/fee growth => clear $DELTA value capture
If those pieces start falling into place, the “Meteora of Robinhood Chain” thesis will have a lot more substance behind it
The question now isn’t whether Delta has a product. It’s whether they can turn this early traction into a real liquidity layer for Robinhood Chain
0xe8ffd7e24187F72afB08d75B1bb13088A989a791 https://x.com/stitchdegen/status/2102491061889429728
## @lorenzo_onx (lorenzo) · 09-22 18:19 · ♥78 ↻5 💬25 Abstract is falling off a cliff, and I’m worried it might never climb back up.
This past year on Abstract has been terrible on pretty much every level. I could write 100 pages about everything that went wrong, but I’ll try to keep it simple.
Let’s quickly recap what the community got these past months:
• Barely any updates to the Portal, their flagship product... • Little to no progress on the wider onchain ecosystem. • Native streaming removed. • Almost 0 communication from the team. • Metrics propped up by the team’s own games. • An All-Star badge. • No real trading updates. • XP inflation like we’ve never seen before.
But what worries me most is what could happen next.
Abstract relied so much on gaming that it stopped giving the rest of the ecosystem enough attention. NFTs, DeFi, trading, other dapps...
Now it looks like OCH/MoG, Gigaverse, Tollan and Cambria could shift more, or even all, of their attention to Robinhood. (Which would leave us with Moody Madness/Archives to carry the chain…)
These are some of the main reasons people still use Abstract. If the games go elsewhere and their users follow, what’s left to keep people here?
Coming back from that would be near impossible. I’d give it a 1% chance, and you probably have to be in denial to still believe it can happen.
Well, I’m in denial.
I still think Abstract could make a full reset and get some market share back. There’s still that 1% chance, but they need to grab it and do something fast before it turns into 0%.
A TGE can be one of the most lucrative events for a project, and I’m pretty sure the team wants it to happen just as much as the community does.
So give people something to look forward to and a reason to stick around.
Be more open about what’s happening behind the scenes. Talk about new hires, upcoming updates and what is actually slowing everything down.
Share the plan for the next few months and where you want Abstract to be in a year or two. People shouldn’t have to guess where the chain is going.
And give Abstract a face. Think Vlad or CZ. Someone who shows up, talks to the community and gives people the feeling that someone is actually there trying to make this work.
But we need more than silence while watching the ecosystem slowly leave and die.
This is not me fudding or saying I don’t believe in Abstract anymore.
If that were the case, I wouldn’t even bother posting this. > 引用 @gucci_gcc: Today i hit Obsidian tier on @AbstractChain, i should probably be happy and feel accomplished, but honestly, i don’t.
Abstract has been really important to me, both for my growth in web3 and as a creator, and i’ll always be grateful to the green chain, but ngl, the last year hasn’t been great here, obviously the market plays a huge role in that, sometimes things go well, sometimes they don’t, that’s just how it is.
What actually worries me is seeing dev after dev leave the Abstract team, especially in the case of 0xBeans, co-founder of Frame, aka Abstract, the message this sends is just not a good one, o hate saying this, but right now the main reasons i still use Abstract are MoG/OCH and Cambria, there are other great dapps, i’m not denying that, but a lot of the ecosystem feels like it’s mostly built around farming rather than actually keeping users around.
Users have been drained, and the team, probably without realizing it, has supported builders who ended up leaving the chain at the first opportunity after extracting hundreds of thousands, sometimes millions, from users, Roachracing, Myriad, Multiplier, YGG, Duper and many others got badges, attention and support from the team, only to eventually bridge out, i don’t even want to make a whole list of all the promises that were made and never delivered, but there have been quite a few.
That being said, Abstract genuinely changed the way people interact with web3, especially normies. AGW and the Portal are perfect examples of that, i still think Abstract has a ton of potential and there’s obviously a lot that can still be built here, maybe if there had been proper DeFi from day one, things could have played out differently and Abstract could have attracted a much broader user base, but it didn’t happen and there’s no point looking back.
I just hope the team can give us some good signals about what’s coming in the near future, i’m not expecting everything to magically get fixed overnight, i’d just like to understand what the actual plan is and where the chain is heading.
Either way, it’s been a fun journey, and I’ll keep using Cambria and MoG like I always have, i’d use them even if they were on ApeChain or Cardano.
All i want is some clarity from the team about where Abstract is actually going next. https://x.com/lorenzo_onx/status/2102462766770483524
## @DustLabsX (Dust) · 09-22 20:26 · ♥60 ↻15 💬16 @DustLabsX × @aeroxyz
Our first integration is officially underway.
Dust is live on @base , powered by @aeroxyz
Every swap you make on Base now rounds up into Coinbase's tokenized stocks. NVDAc, AAPLc, METAc and GOOGLc at launch, every buy routed through Aerodrome Slipstream pools, where the liquidity for these stocks lives.
AERO is on the menu as a partner asset.
Same audited contracts as Robinhood Chain and Arc, unchanged.
Your vault, your withdrawals, nobody but you can move your funds.
Thank you to the Aerodrome team for the docs, the quick answers, and for building the deepest tokenized stock market on Base.
Spare change from every trade on Base now flows into your pools, every single epoch.
Four chains. Pick Base in the app. https://t.co/kHOAWMcNTC https://x.com/DustLabsX/status/2102494843406545107
## @SWEATY333 (Andrεω ☜) · 09-22 20:36 · ♥79 ↻4 💬16 With the way Robinhood is moving, I wouldn’t be surprised if we see the first $1B stockmeme soon.
Robinhood Chain > 引用 @RobinhoodCrypto: Something is coming 🔜 to Stock Tokens. Stay tuned. https://x.com/SWEATY333/status/2102497196990234724