# RWA — X 热门讨论 (2026-09-21 17:25 UTC)
## @thisisseunn (𝗦𝗲𝘂𝗻👾) · 09-21 16:53 · ♥80 ↻61 💬77 $10 giveaway
Max engage quoted
Like rt drop addys fast > 引用 @liuweihyper: 我平时不太会在 Twitter 上发币，但我觉得这个真的很不错。
简单来说，你可以为 Robinhood Chain 上的 RWA 交易对提供流动性，并根据交易量获得收益。
我见过很多技术远不如这个的项目，最后都跑到了高得多的市值，所以我觉得我们现在还非常早。
CA: 0x5fa86d182485df8d0750dcfb27cd8c899ea586c3 https://x.com/thisisseunn/status/2102078728494874880
## @theyfwRayan (Ra-yan) · 09-21 16:54 · ♥82 ↻53 💬83 $10 for one winner
engage quoted post
drop addy, few mins > 引用 @liuweihyper: 我平时不太会在 Twitter 上发币，但我觉得这个真的很不错。
简单来说，你可以为 Robinhood Chain 上的 RWA 交易对提供流动性，并根据交易量获得收益。
我见过很多技术远不如这个的项目，最后都跑到了高得多的市值，所以我觉得我们现在还非常早。
CA: 0x5fa86d182485df8d0750dcfb27cd8c899ea586c3 https://x.com/theyfwRayan/status/2102078968861954155
## @creator_wire (Creator Wire) · 09-21 16:55 · ♥110 ↻7 💬53 Creator Wire x Dualmint
Introducing: Robo Run
This will be a 3-season campaign, with 0.5% of the @DualMintRWA token supply allocated towards Content Creators.
We are starting season 1 with badges, which will be leading into a leaderboard that will live within the Creator Wire App.
More details below ⬇️ https://x.com/creator_wire/status/2102079294746857854
## @SolanaSensei (Solana Sensei) · 09-21 16:44 · ♥76 ↻7 💬41 Solana is the best place to trade any and every coin onchain
- stocks - RWAs - Equities - privacy - L1s & L2s https://t.co/CuwwH4eCd1 https://x.com/SolanaSensei/status/2102076396973723934
## @plumenetwork (Plume) · 09-21 16:45 · ♥63 ↻9 💬8 Banks lent $2.8 billion against 83 tonnes of gold that was actually gilded copper.
Ownership proven on paper can be forged. Learn how onchain attestation closes that gap: https://t.co/sZwwHg66sU https://t.co/k6qEAcWNLK https://x.com/plumenetwork/status/2102076838067507638
## @ChartNerdTA (🇬🇧 ChartNerd 📊) · 09-21 16:13 · ♥59 ↻10 💬2 🇪🇺 Probably Nothing.. 👀
The #ECB has launched Project Pontes, naming Axiology as one of four DLT operators 👇🏼
Axiology, (runs on a private, permissioned based version of XRPL) is a @Ripple RWA tokenization partner, and has used $XRP for DVP payment transactions in prior pilot testing with the ECB.
Showcasing evident links between the #ECB and testing of Ripple's technology 🇪🇺 > 引用 @coinbureau: 🇪🇺BREAKING: ECB launches “Digital Euro” for banks as Pontes begins tokenized finance pilot.
President of the European Central Bank, Christine Lagarde announces The ECB is launching Pontes today, a platform that will connect private blockchain networks with the TARGET system, allowing banks to settle tokenized assets directly in central bank money.
“It's digital euro made available for banks,” the ECB says, allowing institutions to transact using tokenized assets and DLT “faster, without friction," she adds.
Pontes is the first step toward the ECB’s broader Appia ecosystem for tokenized financial markets, while consumer-facing digital euro testing is planned for mid-2027. https://x.com/ChartNerdTA/status/2102068740120563976
## @Mantle_Official (Mantle) · 09-21 15:14 · ♥41 ↻6 💬24 Up is a pretty good direction.
$350M in tokenized RWA value on Mantle, +73% YTD, per @blockworksres.
That’s more assets users can access, trade, and put to work across six asset classes and counting, spanning CeFi + DeFi.
More of global markets, made usable onchain. https://t.co/1BhhJyspXL https://x.com/Mantle_Official/status/2102053747656638498
## @Kaffchad (Kaff 📊) · 09-21 15:32 · ♥47 ↻4 💬18 Crypto finally discovered what TradFi has known forever. If the business prints cash, use some of it to buy back the asset.
After digging through $HYPE, $PONS, $STONK, $LIT and $PUMP, they’re basically 5 different machines doing 5 different versions of the same thing.
1/ $HYPE is what this model is supposed to look like.
– 48.76M HYPE has already been economically removed, ~4.9% of max supply.
@HyperliquidX works out to ~3.6% annualized buyback yield against a $21B mcap, which looks boring beside some names below.
But that’s still ~$62.5M/month of structural demand coming from an actual exchange business.
And another engine turns on soon. AQAv2 routes ~90% of the yield generated by Hyperliquid’s USDC reserves toward the AF, with the first transfer scheduled for Oct 3.
2/ $PONS is where the current math gets stupid.
– @ponsdotfamily did ~$138.3M gross fees in 30d from the RH launch frenzy.
– $24.3M became protocol revenue and ~$14.8M actually flowed toward PONS buybacks.
– 40-43% annualized buyback yield at the current run rate.
– 314.3M PONS, ~31.4% of supply, is already burned.
Yeah the numbers are absurd. $138M monthly fees on a ~$400M launchpad token is also clearly a hot cycle, not something I’d casually annualize for the next 5 years.
3/ $STONK is another version of the same small-cap reflexivity but I like the plumbing here.
– @LaunchOnSF has made ~$19.1M lifetime protocol revenue
– used ~$11.38M for open-market buys, purchasing 166.98M STONK
– 169.72M STONK total has been burned, ~17% of the original supply
– average buyback has been ~$225.8K/day
– 27% annualized buyback yield
But again the ~60% routing is policy, not immutable code. If the RWA-meme volume dies or the operator changes the split, the machine immediately gets smaller.
4/ $PUMP has the strongest enforceability among the launchpad names rn.
– $459.2M cumulative buy+burn and 166.9B PUMP destroyed, ~16.69% of supply
– recent daily burns were ~$763K-$863K/day
– consistently around 47-52% of revenue
– ~$24.3M of holder revenue over the last 30d
– ~10-15% buyback yield, backed by a protocol that has already generated $1B+ cumulative revenue
But the 82.5B team/investor cliff already opened in July and now runs into 3 years of linear unlocks.
Literal burns are great. Literal burns fighting a bigger unlock schedule is a different trade.
5/ $LIT is probably the closest beta to $HYPE.
– @Lighter_xyz did $4.59M protocol revenue and ~$3.26M buybacks in 30d
– ~71% of revenue reached the token
– current buyback yield is around 3.1%
The first major burn in July destroyed ~15.64M LIT, around 6.3% of the then-circulating supply.
But the ~6% staking APY is funded from ecosystem reserves.
If ~125M LIT is staked, that can mean ~7.5M LIT/year coming out as rewards.
Crypto buybacks start becoming actually interesting. Some protocols are finally building a loop where product usage creates revenue, revenue creates token demand
But we still need buyback to subtract unlocks, emissions and staking rewards from whatever the protocol permanently removes.
At the end of the day the token can only compound what the business underneath it earns. https://x.com/Kaffchad/status/2102058326901379114