# Robinhood Chain — X 热门讨论 (2026-09-15 07:20 UTC)
## @PLuto_Miss (米斯先生) · 09-15 06:03 · ♥88 ↻2 💬139 不吹也不黑，一名四年土狗玩家的最真实的Gate打金狗评测与感受 https://x.com/PLuto_Miss/status/2099740928227582072
## @hoodminers_rh (hoodminers) · 09-15 07:08 · ♥127 ↻9 💬50 Mint day⛏️
We make history today, by unlocking 5000 miners on Robinhood chain.
Mint → Activate → Mine
1:30pm UTC Live on @OpenSea.
Every grade sealed until you open it.
You know the drill. Grab your chassis!
But keep an eye on our X and DC, turn 🔔 on, because token can drop any moment! https://x.com/hoodminers_rh/status/2099757350529753549
## @Longdotsupply (Long $) · 09-15 06:13 · ♥85 ↻16 💬40 Post-mortem: the WETH incident of September 14:
On September 14 at 07:07 UTC, the Long bridge paid out a single WETH withdrawal, 46.7928 WETH (about $118,000) left the vault on Robinhood Chain to an attacker's address.
No user lost funds. The vault has been fully refilled from platform revenue, every asset on the bridge is 1:1 backed, and the bridge has been rebuilt, hardened and running without incident since.
Orders placed during the recovery were delayed, some by several hours. We are sorry for the disruption and the uncertainty that caused while we worked through it.
Here is the full account.
What happened:
The bridge has two halves. Users burn tokens on Arc to redeem, and a keeper watches for those burns and releases the matching asset from the vault on Robinhood Chain.
The keeper reads Arc through RPC endpoints. Arc's official public mainnet endpoints were not yet live, so like everyone building on Arc at the time we relied on the standard public RPC the ecosystem was using, with a second endpoint as backup. On the morning of the 14th the backup was over its daily quota, and for a short window the keeper was reading Arc through the primary endpoint alone.
During that window, the primary endpoint served the keeper fabricated withdrawal events. These withdrawals do not exist on Arc. No tokens were burned, the redeem counter never moved for them and the supply never dropped. They were fabricated event logs delivered through the RPC channel, and they were well prepared: they used our contract addresses, our event format and our vault balances.
The keeper's safeguards at the time were built to stop replays and duplicate payouts. They were not built to question the data source itself. When the fabricated WETH withdrawal arrived, the keeper confirmed it had never been paid before and released 46.7928 WETH.
Three further fabricated withdrawals in other assets were attempted in the same minutes. All three reverted on-chain and nothing else left the bridge. The WETH payout was the only loss.
Whether the provider's infrastructure was compromised or the data was altered in transit is still under investigation, and we are not naming the provider while that is open. What we can say with confidence is that the fabricated events entered through the RPC channel, not through our contracts, our keys or our vaults. Nothing on-chain was breached.
Response, same day (all times UTC):
07:07 Fabricated withdrawal paid. 46.7928 WETH released.
07:10 Monitoring flags the WETH vault as under-collateralised.
07:13 Keeper stopped. No further payouts possible.
07:30 to 11:00 Forensics, root cause established, keeper rebuilt with a new verification pipeline, unit-tested and dry-run live against both chains.
11:31 Hardened keeper live. Every one of the roughly 1,000 queued orders audited (0 invalid) and settled oldest first.
12:44 Separate audit pass over all payouts since restart: 292 of 292 confirmed.
15:29 and 15:47 : WETH vault refilled from platform revenue: 12 WETH, then 30.9828 WETH.
15:38 WETH withdrawals resumed. All pending withdrawals paid.
16:31 Bridge fully reopened with new limits in place.
18:12 On-chain caps tightened across all assets.
Impact: Lost from the vault: 46.7928 WETH, since bridged by the attacker to Ethereum, where about 44.96 ETH still sits at the same address.
Users: no user lost funds. Orders placed during the rebuild were delayed by up to eight hours, and every one of them settled.
Backing: the WETH vault was under-collateralized for about eight hours and was refilled the same day from platforms revenue. Every other asset on the bridge stayed fully backed throughout.
What we changed We are deliberately not publishing the internal details of the new keeper. In broad terms: No payout or mint is ever made on the word of a single data source. Every order is verified independently against chain state from multiple sources, before funds move and again after.
Hard limits: $2,500 per order in each direction, with anything above held for manual review, and $100,000 per hour per direction.
These limits are conservative on purpose. We will raise them step by step as official RPC is available on 16th and will announce each change.
Backing and transactions:
The vault has been refilled in full from platform revenue collected on over $10 million of bridge volume in a day. No user funds were used and no token was diluted.
Weth Vault (Robinhood Chain): https://t.co/QpX3SmgynW
Fraudulent payout: https://t.co/g95TjTXN5u
Refill 1, 12 WETH: https://t.co/MlSbToooY1
Refill 2, 30.9828 WETH: https://t.co/eBQCyVpX0V
Refill 3, 3.82 WETH: https://t.co/bQP0wNqaRp
Attacker address (Ethereum): https://t.co/SBt06HRfTJ
As of now, every asset on the bridge is fully backed by the matching assets held in custody on Robinhood Chain. Anyone can verify this by comparing Arc supply against the vault balances.
If an order of yours still needs attention, message us with transaction hash and we will look into it personally.
What's next
Arc public mainnet launches on the 16th. The bridge moves to Arc's official mainnet RPC as soon as it is live, alongside our own node, so no single third-party endpoint sits in the payout path again.
To the attacker: 0xBC3333665007e4b4C830937c0Cd85E47EB54dCcf
You are holding about 44.96 ETH taken from this bridge's user vault and rest on robinhood.
We are offering standard whitehat terms.
Return 42.11 ETH (90 percent of what was taken) to 0xd66447a19E7BCfe56fbd22354ef9bF30f48eafDC by September 18, 12:00 UTC and keep the remainder as a bounty. We will treat the matter as closed, publish that the funds were returned and pursue nothing further.
Refilling the vault did not depend on recovering these funds. Any verified return will be acknowledged publicly.
If the funds are not returned by then, the full trace, including your exit path through Jumper/LI.FI and Relay, goes to law enforcement, exchange compliance teams and independent on-chain investigators, and the address stays flagged.
Closing: Long is a custodial bridge, and we have always said so plainly. We built it to make bringing real stocks to Arc simple, and we know this incident caused real concern, especially for anyone waiting on a transaction. Within few minutes the loss was found, the bridge was rebuilt, every queued order was settled and the vault was made whole from our own revenue.
Thank you to everyone who waited patiently, sent feedback or offered help. Confidence is earned by how we operate from here, and we intend to earn it.
🔵Native USDC, Reward Mode and @DinariGlobal stocks integration remain on schedule.
Long arc. https://x.com/Longdotsupply/status/2099743494994899052
## @Nick_Researcher (Nick Research) · 09-15 04:58 · ♥74 ↻8 💬25 Unpopular opinion: @arc is hot, but its eco looks like a copycat of Robinhood
as you might know, i’ve spent the past few days digging through Arc projects before public mainnet
the clearest signal: 50+ launchpads already exist
well you know Robinhood started the tokenized stock + memecoin launchpad war with @ponsdotfamily, @longdotxyz and others
then the same model then expanded to: - Solana: $STONK, $EMBER - BNB Chain: $BREW - Now Arc: dozens of similar platforms
imho, launchpads are EAST TO FORK
and there is a reason devs keep choosing this model → it generates REAL FEES only with a “low” effort
current launchpad sector metrics:
- $241.4M TVL - $77.3M fees in 7D - $25.2M revenue in 7D
$PONS alone generated $45.9M in 7D fees and $7.5M in revenue
on a new chain, a launchpad is one of the fastest ways to attract liquidity, create assets and capture trading fees
i see the same pattern with gamified NFTs
the narrative gained traction on Robinhood → now devs are bringing similar concepts to Arc and Ink
my concern is the lack of native, differentiated protocols on Arc
i’ve tried to find projects that could create a new category or narrative, but there are only a few
most major Day-1 deployments are established DeFi protocols such as Uniswap, Aave and Fluid
strong infra, but they are not uniquely Arc
for now, my main Arc thesis is the LAUNCHPAD WAR
i expect it to be brutal from the first day of public mainnet
there may be more 50+ competitors, but I believe only 1-2 will survive and eventually control most of the volume
that's why i worked hard to filter out the real leader this week
S-tier rank projects are those i believe have a real edge before launch - @liftdotfun - @minarafun - @TradePools - @akadotfun - @Arguspad - @TollyLabs
still to much, but i think at least one of them will outperform and thrive
i could be completely wrong if Arc mainnet launches with several strong native protocols that are still under wraps
@jerallaire might already notice this situation, real founder keeps building iykyk
but i’d rather plan around the facts & signals available today than speculate about products i haven’t seen
Arc will receive major attention at launch
i wonder how quickly that attention converts into sustainable liquidity and how long it stays there
hype may come and go very quickly
be ready, be wise fam! > 引用 @Nick_Researcher: well, that @arc launchpad ranking aged fast 😭
since my first post went live, 10+ new launchpads have appeared in my notifications
i went through every one, did more DD and spoke directly with several dev teams
a few are run by solo devs, but they’ve been extremely active and are shipping upgrades fast
so here’s the updated ranking:
• 10+ new platforms added • several launchpads re-ranked after deeper research • added "X Alpha" feature scanning major news/project • more changes likely as new teams keep appearing
now S-tier includes: - @liftdotfun - $DEPEG = first-mover - @akadotfun - AKA - @Arguspad - ARGUS - @minarafun - N/A
i'm looking into @TollyLabs | TOLLY as they are working smoothly, might be in S-tier
LONG has a RED FLAG because of the FUD + website is not working properly atm
Arc is moving way faster than i expected
this ranking will keep evolving with the eco https://x.com/Nick_Researcher/status/2099724515941155273
## @0x_Kalista (Kalista.hl (τ τ) ⟠) · 09-15 02:53 · ♥62 ↻0 💬42 📝Let's look at @Arc - public mainnet is Sept 16. The pad war already started.
Same movie as Robinhood Chain. Day-one venues ate the flow. Pads that showed up two weeks late never caught up.
Gas is USDC. Entries aren’t getting eaten by a volatile gas token. That’s the whole meme-game change.
Volume leaders (pre-public numbers, mid-Sept)
1/ Tolly @TollyLabs Real flow king. ~$1.8M vol, 200+ tokens. No curve. Full supply into a locked Uni V3 USDC pool from block one. Creators keep 64% of buy fees. Open source. $TOLLY last printed around $2.0–2.2M MC (ATH ~$2.47M).
2/ Warp @circlewarp Pump playbook, USDC settlement. Curve → WarpDex, LP burn near $69k. Site has shown $1.5–2.15M vol and 170–286 launches ~84% of that vol is $WARP itself. One graduation in six weeks. CCTP is the bet: ETH/Base buyers, less bridge friction.
3/ Archemist @Archemistdotfun Tweet the bot, token exists. V4 hooks, anti-snipe, buybacks, up to 80% creator share. ~$300–337k vol, ~49 tokens. ~77% of vol is $ARCH.
Discovery
4/ RadarDex @ArcDEXScan Scanner + aggregator + pad. Wins even when another pad wins. Thousands of launches. Community flags wash. Use it to *see*, not to trust the count.
5/ ArcPad @arcpad_xyz Purist locked V3 LP, 1% fee 50/50, claim in USDC. ~15 tokens, vol still tiny.
Structured / day-one
@ChainGPT_Pad: KYC IDO, not memes. @Arcfunapp: $4k start, $7.2k raise, atomic migrate, no team bag. @Flutchfun: launch/swap/bridge/stake, ~70% creator share, WL for day one. @NebulaPad: one-click, $6k raise, LP burn. @actfunxyz: mine-to-launch. Contract pauses already. Size small.
The chain behind it @Circle + 11 validators: @BlackRock, @The_DTCC, @Visa, @Mastercard, @ICE_Markets, @galaxyhq, @StanChart, and the rest. Testnet: 500M+ txs, ~3M wallets. Private mainnet already had 100+ builders. Public open Sept 16. Chain ID 5042.
RH lesson still holds: being live at genesis *is* the edge. Tolly, Warp, RadarDex have that head start.
Most early “volume” is still pads trading their own tokens. CCTP wasn’t a free-for-all on day zero. Treat pre-public stats as a ranking, not a promise. https://x.com/0x_Kalista/status/2099692932756582630