# "smart contract" (exploit OR hacked OR drained) — X 热门讨论 (2026-09-28 10:55 UTC)
## @CryptoPatel (Crypto Patel) · 09-28 09:30 · ♥136 ↻11 💬6 Fake GIWA Mainnet Scam: $2M $ETH Drained Via Counterfeit Upbit Layer 2 Bridge
A major crypto scam targeted users through a fake GIWA network impersonating the upcoming GIWA Layer 2 mainnet.
WHAT HAPPENED? 🔸 @GIWA_by_Upbit mainnet has NOT launched yet 🔸 Scammers created a fake network using GIWA’s Chain ID 9134 🔸 A fraudulent bridge was used to attract ETH 🔸 1,335+ addresses interacted with it 🔸 ~767.65 ETH was deposited 🔸 766.25 ETH ($2.08M) was drained
ON-CHAIN PROOF: An Ethereum transaction shows 766.254 ETH transferred, worth approximately $2.08M. Block: 26067309
IMPORTANT: GIWA had repeatedly warned that its mainnet was not live. DYORSWAP also clarified this was not a direct smart-contract hack.
VICTIM COMPENSATION: DYORSWAP says it has already compensated affected users with 200+ ETH from its own funds, while investigations into the attackers and fund flows continue.
KEY LESSON: Never trust an RPC, bridge, Chain ID or network simply because it looks legitimate. Always verify through official sources.
#GIWA https://x.com/CryptoPatel/status/2104503885633388889