# Robinhood Chain — X 热门讨论 (2026-10-08 08:36 UTC)

## @CurtainsPrivacy (Curtains) · 10-08 01:37 · ♥45 ↻23 💬6 CURTAIN lets you privately hold, trade, and use $USDG and tokenized stocks on Robinhood Chain, while proving funds are clean and keeping control of your exit.

Build is as legit as it can be:

https://t.co/PTyA6iKQO4 https://x.com/CurtainsPrivacy/status/2108008823776747584

## @Elikrypt (ΞLIKRYPTO) · 10-08 07:08 · ♥50 ↻2 💬22 IDENTITY MD ($IMD) THE AI WORKFORCE ECONOMY

$IMD started as a game token.

Identity MD is turning it into the economic layer for an AI workforce.

2,000 NFT seats → AI workers → verified jobs → onchain reputation → $IMD

$FP → Ethereum Oct 2025 → $VIBE Jan 2026 → $IMD May 2026.

The May rename introduced 2,000 free identity.md NFTs. Each is a work permit for one computer.

The holder supplies the machine and AI subscription, registers the agent through ERC-8004 @8004_org and runs the open-source worker.

Jobs include code, websites, research, audits, launches and oracle requests.

Job → seat → AI work → isolated verification → agent review → onchain reputation.

25 SEPTEMBER SNAPSHOT

✧ 380 seats enrolled ✧ 372+ agents online ✧ ~780 NFT owners ✧ 43,800+ accepted submissions ✧ ~17.3B inference tokens ✧ ~86% accepted

Top 10 seats produced ~8.5% of accepted work. Top 50 produced ~32%.

External users pay 0.5 $IMD per request through x402 @x402protocol.

✧ 115 paid orders ✧ 57.5 $IMD spent ✧ ~$560

This is the key number.

Large job counts show activity. Recurring external orders show demand.

$IMD pays for work and powers Community Coins, burn and staking mechanisms.

Contract:

0xD34a99Bc0f67aE1bbd63C660e6d0b0dd03E263B7

10M $IMD were originally minted. No new supply has been created.

~7.1M remained in the September snapshot, meaning ~29% had been removed.

Supply is bridged 1:1 across Ethereum @ethereum, Base @base and Robinhood Chain @RobinhoodChain.

POOL4 is the protocol-owned ETH and $IMD pool on Uniswap v4 @Uniswap.

Its hook caps $IMD inventory. When sells push the pool above the cap, excess is trimmed.

For every 100 $IMD:

✧ 85% burned ✧ 6% bonding reserve ✧ 4.5% stakers ✧ 4.5% NFT inference nodes

The 1% swap fee is protocol revenue, separate from the burn and reward flow.

Staking uses sIMD, an ERC-4626 vault share. The staking allocation is live; bonding and node allocations are currently reserves, not live products.

POOL4 is experimental and unaudited.

Community Coins lets anyone launch a token with bonding curves priced in $IMD rather than ETH.

Launch → trading → $IMD demand → burn

Early October:

✧ ~208 coins ✧ ~681 ETH volume ✧ ~3,957 $IMD burned

These are not official IMD products. Check the contract.

✧ @IdentityUnits — NFT creation and review ✧ @HIVE_imd — pooled seats and hosting ✧ @SuperIMD_eth — paid swarm jobs ✧ @blueprintimd — community-directed builds ✧ @imddrones — drone NFTs ✧ @imdusd — agent-priced stablecoin experiment ✧ @swarmpepes — swarm-created collection ✧ @IMDTools — jobs, launches and oracle ✧ @Pepesdotfamily — Robinhood Chain development

Identity MD’s first hackathon runs 7–21 October, with winners by 23 October and a $15K+ pool. Projects must launch through the explorer and build beyond a plain token.

The oracle is another potential use:

Question → multiple agents → quorum → signed result → smart contract

If protocols eventually pay for these answers, IMD could move toward machine-verifiable information infrastructure.

Still a thesis, not a proven market.

@virtuals_io:

One agent → its own token → users → revenue

IMD:

2,000 seats → shared workforce → one economic layer → jobs and verification

The difference is individual agent economies versus a coordinated machine workforce.

Hold or stake $IMD → bet on the token economy.

Run a seat → supply AI work and pay model costs.

Pay 0.5 $IMD → buy work from the swarm.

Identity MD already has the seats, agents, work history, token mechanics, launchpad, oracle and ecosystem.

The missing piece is sustained external demand.

Until strangers consistently pay for the output, Identity MD is an impressive AI coordination experiment, not a proven business.

That makes paid order count more important than NFT floor or agent count. https://x.com/Elikrypt/status/2108092206816907641

## @R2D2zen (R2D2) · 10-08 06:38 · ♥47 ↻0 💬29 The following 171 chains recorded revenue in the last 30 days according to DefiLlama.

Solana, Hyperliquid L1, Ethereum, Robinhood Chain, BSC, Base, Polygon, Arbitrum, Avalanche, edgeX L1, zkLighter, OP Mainnet, Near, ZKsync Era, ADI, TON, Sui, Tron, Ink, Arc, TxFlow, Abstract, Monad, Native Core, Aptos, Derive Chain, Stellar, ValueChain, Bitcoin, Chainflip, Mantle, XRPL, dYdX, Plasma, Cardano, X Layer, PulseChain, MegaETH, Sei, Bulk, Immutable zkEVM, Canton, Ronin, THORChain, Stacks, Manta, Cronos, Flare, Sonic, Vaulta, ApeChain, Sis, AlphaSec, Hydration, Dexalot, SX Rollup, Linea, Blast, Morph_tachyon, Plume Mainnet, Mezo, Osmosis, Hedera, Berachain, Open, Gnosis, Algorand, Fluent, Litecoin, Starknet, Katana, ICP, Bitcoincash, Merlin, Provenance, MultiversX, Strato Chain, CosmosHub, XO, Unichain, ReyaChain, CORE, IOTA EVM, ZIGChain, Babylon Genesis, Filecoin, Data Network, Doge, Celo, BOB, Soneium, Scroll, Morph, Bifrost, Hemi, Kaia, Pharos, Fuel Ignition, XDC, ENI, Mayachain, Igra, World Chain, Chiliz, Kava, Metis, ALEO, Citrea, Eden, Injective, Fraxtal, Etherlink, Terra Classic, Coti, Gravity by Galxe, Shido, Conflux, Kasplex, 0G, Movement, Lens, Chain_global, opBNB, Somnia, Waves, Ethereal, Radix, BandChain, Fuse, Fantom, XPR Network, Lisk, Stable, HAQQ, Mode, Chia, Celestia, Bifrost Network, GateLayer, Cronos zkEVM, Pacaswap, Zircuit, KCC, Boba, Zora, Vara, Flow, Sophon, BSquared, Taiko, Juno, Peaq, KUB, Kub, Songbird, Rootstock, Tempo, RISE, IoTeX, Quai, TAC, Bitlayer, Redbelly, Aurora, Telos, Arbitrum Nova, ZetaChain, Superposition, Supra, HashKey Chain, Vana.

RIP Blast and Abstract from the list as both announced already winding down. https://x.com/R2D2zen/status/2108084604494057954

## @lanhubiji (蓝狐) · 10-08 04:28 · ♥42 ↻3 💬9 以太坊的代币化基金的一周增量大约是 Stellar 的两倍，是第三名之后总和的近9倍。

前两名合计约占图中全部增量的 93%。

说明了三个事情：

一是，机构级代币化基金选链高度集中，不太跟零售链热度走。

这类资产主要是货币市场基金/美国国债基金/信贷基金。

发行方要的是合规、托管、结算和已有分发渠道，不是 TPS 或 meme 活跃度。

由此，Solana/Base/BNB Chain 在散户和 DeFi 上可以很热闹，在这类产品的周增量里几乎看不见。

Robinhood链也开始出现在榜单末尾，也说明券商自有链还没成为基金发行的主场。

二是，表面看是双寡头格局，但其实更多是单寡头。

以太坊是默认的机构发行与结算层：BlackRock BUIDL、Ondo、Superstate、部分 J.P. Morgan 产品等都在上面，这一周 +3.5 亿美元只是存量优势在继续放大。

Stellar 能居第二，不是生态叙事，主要是是 Franklin Templeton 的代币化货币基金（BENJI）长期以 Stellar 为主场，另外Sky、J.P. Morgan有少量试点，算不上机构多数认同

三是，继续强化以太坊作为 RWA 结算网络的位置，不过，不会自动变成 gas 费或 ETH 需求，短期内不会对ETH产生明显影响。如果资产达到更大规模级别（如数百亿/千亿美元以上），会对估值产生明显影响。

最后，L2 在这张图里几乎为零，也说明基金发行方目前仍把资产放在 L1，不是跟着应用层流动性走。 https://x.com/lanhubiji/status/2108051985060839555