# Robinhood — X 热门讨论 (2026-09-27 17:27 UTC)
## @iammattiex (Mattie) · 09-27 16:49 · ♥65 ↻0 💬37 It's been a dull week kinda
Robinhood NFTs has not been the best this week. But that's the market, it's never green 24/7
The whole Zec thingy has already died off, and I think the reason was kinda obvious.
Let's lock in guys, this new week will be a good one! https://x.com/iammattiex/status/2104252040780075264
## @vampsonchain (Vamps) · 09-27 16:23 · ♥50 ↻19 💬8 MINTED OUT IN 4 MINUTES BY THE FAITH OF THE COMMUNITY! > 引用 @RealCashpig: https://t.co/pTJoT3rzZj https://x.com/vampsonchain/status/2104245498592780628
## @byTheGentleman (The Gentleman) · 09-27 15:24 · ♥56 ↻12 💬7 $INDEX JUST BECAME MONEY.
You can now deposit $INDEX on Longbow and borrow USDG against it without selling your bag.
This is the kind of utility I want to see.
First @TheIndexFi paid holders in tokenized stocks.
Now your robinhood:0x56910d4409f3a0c78c64dd8d0545ff0705389870 itself can be used as collateral.
The bag is becoming productive. > 引用 @byTheGentleman: $INDEX HAS ALREADY PAID 43,800 WALLETS IN STOCKS.
The numbers are getting harder to ignore.
Indices has now done:
> $26.5M in volume > $902K in tokenized stocks distributed > 43.8K wallets paid
And that's only one part of what @TheIndexFi is building.
The wider protocol has already distributed ~$1.65M in tokenized stocks.
Now Indices lets other coins turn their own trading fees into stock rewards.
robinhood:0x56910d4409f3a0c78c64dd8d0545ff0705389870 ~$29M market cap, I'm still watching the gap between the product and the token. https://x.com/byTheGentleman/status/2104230732419777000
## @0xSammy (0xSammy) · 09-27 14:52 · ♥53 ↻1 💬15 Copped another two @standard_rsv branches today
The liquidity engine thesis around earning yield by supplying other protocols / pools is something you should pay attention to
Several charters have been burned, but with yesterday’s chartered auction costing > 3 ETH this could get silly
Remember the daily Noun auctions and the multi million dollar treasury they accumulated? This will be magnitudes larger imo
The team is listening to feedback and iterating rapidly; simple UX improvements like limit orders on branch purchases or the recent sBill staking announcement is forming the foundation of the larger strategic DeFi primitive plugged into RWAs
The Robinhood summit starts on September 29th; pay attention to what’s discussed there… they’re plugged into the top protocols building on their chain and will likely support those that add value through liquidity depth or UX improvements for getting exposure to stocks, commodities and other assets
I came for STANDARD’s early ponzi Ohm like flywheel, but unlike ohm there’s signs of larger fundamentals that could see this sustain well beyond your typical DeFi protocol
Institutions want liquidity depth; this is. offering a viable solution with novel mechanics to solve for this > 引用 @0xSammy: People are underestimating how important liquidity is for RWAs
Tokenizing an asset is the “easy” part… but building enough market depth that serious size can enter or exit without moving the price against itself
That’s why I’m increasingly focused on protocols explicitly designed to solve the liquidity bottleneck on Robinhood Chain:
1) @longdotxyz (AI MC; $234m) turn activity into permanently locked stock liquidity
LONG pairs assets directly against tokenized stocks rather than ETH/stables
This is important because demand for the paired asset directly creates trading volume and liquidity for the stock itself
Stock tokens accumulated in LONG pools are permanently locked, while fees/community vaults can compound further stock exposure over time
It effectively uses speculation as a distribution and liquidity engine for RWAs
——————————————
2) @standard_rsv ($19.6m): use the protocol balance sheet as a market maker
Standard’s second mandate is structurally different… Instead of waiting for third-party LPs, it wants to deploy its own reserve capital into stock-token markets, seed depth, attract additional liquidity and earn fees from the resulting order flow
Those fees can then feed back into the reserve and finance deeper or additional markets
In other words, the treasury becomes productive market-making capital rather than passive NAV
——————————————
3) @shroom_network ($15.7m) create a common liquidity layer across stocks
SHROOM is building a “hub-and-spoke” model by pairing itself against major stock tokens
Instead of every stock needing completely isolated liquidity, SHROOM becomes a common routing asset between markets
The protocol owns the liquidity, captures fees from volume and price dislocations across the network, with treasury LP fees ultimately flowing into SHROOM buybacks/burns
More stocks = more routes = more volume = more fees = potentially deeper network liquidity
——————————————
Three different approaches to the same problem:
i) LONG turns attention into stock liquidity
ii) STANDARD turns treasury capital into stock liquidity
iii) SHROOM turns fragmented stock liquidity into a connected network
If RWAs are going to handle genuinely large flows onchain, this layer matters just as much as the assets themselves https://x.com/0xSammy/status/2104222762449477738