# "address poisoning" — X 热门讨论 (2026-09-26 14:36 UTC)
## @luong4101992 (nbaluong (✱,✱)) · 09-26 09:50 · ♥24 ↻0 💬23 We somehow accepted that sending crypto should begin with copying 42+ characters and hoping we pasted the right ones. @Americanfort_io
That small habit can become an expensive mistake.
American fort takes a different approach with FortressName:
Send to a name. Receive at a fresh address.
Instead of exposing a permanent wallet address, FortressName uses fresh one-time addresses for payments, while stealth addresses handle the privacy underneath.
That means no long address to copy, no permanent public wallet for attackers to monitor, and fewer opportunities for address-poisoning mistakes.
One FortressName can also work across 13 integrated networks.
Better crypto UX isn’t just about fewer clicks.
Sometimes, it’s about removing the tiny mistakes that can become expensive forever. https://x.com/luong4101992/status/2103784141020148169