# Robinhood Chain liquidity — X 热门讨论 (2026-09-12 22:03 UTC)
## @PrivatumRH (Privatum) · 09-12 05:52 · ♥70 ↻39 💬7 Native DEX Swaps are now live in Privatum. $PRIV
Swap directly from your 2-of-3 account on Robinhood Chain. Privatum checks Uniswap v3 and v4 liquidity, picks the better quote, then handles the approval and swap in one ERC-4337 transaction.
No separate approval transaction sitting around. No extra steps before the trade.
Update the app and try it. https://x.com/PrivatumRH/status/2098650815896617189
## @Autheo_Network (Autheo) · 09-12 12:50 · ♥70 ↻10 💬38 THEO is now live on Robinhood Chain.
Provide liquidity with THEO and USDG on Uniswap v3 and earn LP rewards.
With THEO now available on Robinhood Chain, it’s accessible to a broader onchain audience.
THEO/USGD trading pair on Uniswap v3 on Robinhood Chain 👇 https://t.co/mcZbdor85u https://x.com/Autheo_Network/status/2098756170836263097
## @Cryptotrissy (Trissy) · 09-12 13:36 · ♥85 ↻4 💬12 Long xyz is the ai16z of this meta.
Their goal: “make billion dollar runners” - @Natan_benish
The same way that ai16z was home turf for the best developer tooling to build AI agents, Long xyz is home turf to the best liquidity sources for tokenized assets.
Tokenized stocks liquidity flywheel = AI agents plugin/integration flywheel
Eliza gave developers a shared runtime where actions, providers, evaluators, memory, social clients and onchain tooling could all be plugged into the same agent. Every new integration made the framework more useful for the next developer, which made the next agent easier to build.
What makes Long’s launchpad different is the pre bond (dutch auction) launch mechanic. A mechanism from the NFT days where price moves down during the auction to reduce how much of an advantage snipers get at launch. Although with the recent changes, what happens after launch is the more interesting part.
Fees from volume can be routed into a vault accumulating the underlying RWA, while fees can also systematically grow LP and mechanically reduce supply. Volume isn’t purely extractive, every trade can incrementally strengthen the market structure of the token itself.
Which is a very different design philosophy from most launchpads since success creates fees for the platform but doesn’t necessarily create a stronger token.
For a launchpad to succeed beyond more than its narrative, it needs genuinely interesting tokens which can stand on their own narrative/memetics/utility. This is why you’ll see a thousand copy cats once the originator takes off and starts a new meta.
Launchpad vamps can be convincing and shiny object syndrome makes it difficult to distinguish whether an emerging eco is genuinely coming for the throne or just another short lived rotation.
The easiest way to distinguish a meta from a rotation is breadth.
One token running can be reflexivity. Multiple unrelated tokens sustaining volume, holders and liquidity is when you start getting evidence that the underlying rails themselves have PMF.
This was also part of what separated ai16z. Eliza wasn’t dependent on a single agent use case, the same runtime could power agents that interact, query external data, retain memory, execute onchain etc.
Earlier in the week Nate hinted at enhancing the depth of all assets across the platform: https://t.co/Wcf2ai5ML6
Assuming there’s some type of stocks -> AI -> NVDA routing, you’re effectively creating a liquidity graph where child markets can share a common intermediary instead of every pair needing to support completely isolated depth.
This matters as liquidity fragmentation is one of the biggest problems once you move from trench sized positions into actual size. Early on you care about asymmetric entry and incentives. Later on you care whether you can put 6-7 figs through a route without nuking yourself on price impact.
This is also why Nate’s point around $AI and eventually the wider eco becoming highly liquid matters more than just having another token run. Liquidity itself becomes the product.
You get a positive double edged sword as new pairs are incentivised with anti snipe dutch auction mechanics that provide greater bootstrapping, while fee derived rewards are more meaningful to early holders. As tokens reach maturity with larger mcaps, traders aren’t necessarily looking for reflections but deeper liquidity as they believe the narrative is worth sizing into.
So the incentive curve changes with the life cycle of the token.
Appealing to a multitude of trading strategies is important as when comparing to Pump’s bonding curve, it highly benefits deployers and those playing in the sub 1 mil range which is why we see a lot of 1-5 mil toppers as fees drop off significantly.
Both Long and Robinhood are aligned with these incentive mechanisms as more successful runners creates deeper liquidity for future Long tokens. While Robinhood’s chain has overall higher TVL, opening the gates for more complicated DeFi, Agent, dividend etc strategies due to excess idle capital.
Speculation is effectively being used as the liquidity acquisition layer for tokenized equities.
Memecoins bring attention + volume -> volume creates fees -> fees reinforce liquidity -> better liquidity allows larger traders to participate -> larger markets make the underlying rails more attractive for the next launch -> accumulated tokenized equities produce new trading strategies
ai16z commoditized agent creation while letting the agents manufacture their own distribution. Long is trying to commoditize token creation while letting the tokens manufacture their own liquidity. > 引用 @Cryptotrissy: The writing is on the wall for what the dominant meta will be in the upcoming bull.
So much so that even with the slightest signs of corrections, launchpads like $STONK and underlying tokens are flying on opposing chains.
This is by far the closest euphoria we’ve seen in comparison to AI szn. While it feels late, I think we’re still late early considering Vlad only just followed $AMC and the HIM’s CEO followed $BONER.
We’ve only had one Robinhood listing for $PONS thus far which was done quite late into the pump. We’re yet to see many strong endorsements from Vlad and traders are pricing the eco significantly high due to how he’s handled the attention roadmap.
Sol’s biggest issue is it doesn’t have a native exchange which can be used as a catalyst. Remove the possibility of being listed on the Robinhood app and I can guarantee these coins would be multiples lower.
We’ve been cynical for a liquidity catalyst that brings external capital like we do every bear market. Now we’ve finally found one and it’s such a strong moat that volume across social trading platforms had its highest week since Trump coin.
I was expecting more input from Vlad to carry the momentum but traders have been so starved of a quality leader that they’re willing to place all their eggs in one basket with the meme x tokenized stock barbell.
Coins like $AMC and $BONER are going to be flagships for how dying or new gen companies can be saved with memetics if the CEO co operates or drives some form of attention to them.
The easiest way to understand this is reverse engineer yourself as a CEO of a brick and mortar company. Revenues declining, sales are decline, customer acquisition is low, marketing is declining, AI is stealing marketshare. You see Vlad doing numbers with the Robinhood chain that took his exchange years to reach in a matter of weeks. Stocks like AMC and HIMs are in the limelight because they decided to spend 5 seconds interacting with a memecoin, with the potential to bring a new cultural movement for their products.
How many contacts in tradfi like the HIM’s CEO do you think Vlad has access to? Do you think he’d be able to convince other public CEO’s to support memecoins adjacent to their stock if he can show previous results that its improved mindshare, volume and price?
Public CEO’s engaging with memes is by far the most asymmetric chance of external capital entering our space. Hyperliquid has been the best performing asset as it’s been able to leverage decentralized trading for tradfi which is where we know all the capital is sitting.
This is a direct correlation to the liquidity we’ve been trying to siphon from stocks to onchain with the help of the biggest stock trading degeneracy app in the world. You can’t make a more perfect storm.
The Hims marketcap is $6B. Amc is $2B. For reference that’s #20 and #45 respectively when comparing against the highest crypto mcaps. Crypto participants deeply underestimate how much capital and social influence they control over markets.
We’ve tried this idea before with ICM but we didn’t have the tail winds of a leader like RH or tokenized stocks being embedded into our infra.
2021 was NFTs (culture, artists, small funds)
2023 was memecoins (TikTok, rich natives, zoomers)
2024 was AI szn (power users of frontier models, low level devs, mostly native capital)
2026 is memefied stocks (public CEO’s of the largest companies in the world being KOLs and bringing external capital + attention)
We’ve never seen such a perfected attention roadmap by a new upcoming chain, no leaks in any vertical of the business. Everytime we get some form of fud or uncertainty he steps in at the perfect time to stop coins/volume from going stale. There’s no interns mis firing on tweets, no core team members being hacked, no desperation or direct marketing, Vlad is simply S tier.
If you’re in Solana’s position, this is quite scary to watch. https://x.com/Cryptotrissy/status/2098767809698472099
## @Ekonomeest (Ekonomeest) · 09-12 13:15 · ♥72 ↻8 💬7 I am getting increasingly convinced that @fablesfi could become the liquidity layer of Robinhood Chain.
initially dismissed it as another Solidly-style ve(3,3) fork. but I was wrong and ended up buying at the price I deserved.
Fables is a differentiated bet on onchain equity trading infrastructure.
better risk pricing → better net LP returns → stickier liquidity → better execution → more trading activity.
what i found novel with Fables ( which is the key goal of my investing style, always finding tech novelty similar to how I found @Quotrons404
Fables uses custom Uniswap v4 hooks to adjust fees around equity trading sessions, holidays, market openings and closings. Fees are automatically adjusted based on trade directions and market conditions
the general idea is that LPs keep costs low while keeping execution still competitive for traders
current metrics: 20M in TVL 500M in volume ranked #2 in Robinhood native protocols in TVL ( behind @arcus_xyz which has 24M) which means #1 soon https://t.co/mGMC2g5RAG
devs are doxxed, @0xlayans & @0xcs361 have previously worked on Alphix and Spectra, their associated project, Canary, was an ETHGlobal New York 2026 finalist and won Chainlink’s “Best workflow with CRE” category.
Alphix which forms the codebase of Fables was already audited by Sherlock.
how to get exposure:
-buying robinhood:0xb9972ca7188e511174947e3936a5315ac7073277 at the open market -providing liquidity and farming
1. existing robinhood:0xb9972ca7188e511174947e3936a5315ac7073277 holders receives 1/3 of Fables circulating supply at TGE 2. liquidity pool providers receives 2/3 of Fables circulating supply at TGE
Fables has also added more pools. If you decide to farm, ref here: https://t.co/XE7jx5Y0hF
imo, $PONS won the launchpad wars on Robinhood, but the market has not priced in the liquidity layer of Robinhood.
Robinhood isn't going away and I will always bet on novel tech than chase the next launchpad fork. https://x.com/Ekonomeest/status/2098762486011019397