# Robinhood Chain liquidity — X 热门讨论 (2026-09-23 09:01 UTC)
## @Leeheart_idris (Leeheart) · 09-23 04:57 · ♥127 ↻11 💬146 GM CT 🤍
Another chain just became part of https://t.co/6CUDoVhT3t's cross-chain network.
Arc is now live.
Circle's new EVM-compatible Layer-1 is built around stablecoin finance, with USDC as native gas.
https://t.co/6CUDoVhT3t users can now swap USDC on Arc across TON and other supported networks in one flow.
The interesting part is what happens underneath.
Omniston coordinates the route from quote to settlement, so users can focus on the swap instead of figuring out every chain connection.
https://t.co/6CUDoVhT3t now connects stablecoin liquidity across TON, TRON, Ethereum, BNB Chain, Base, Avalanche, Arbitrum, Polygon, Robinhood Chain, X Layer and Arc.
Arc transactions are currently limited to $1,000 per transaction during the initial rollout.
More connected networks means less fragmentation for users.
Try it: https://t.co/TSqucRa3TL
Arc: https://t.co/cQ3xSszBi5 https://x.com/Leeheart_idris/status/2102623353353666683
## @JulesNetX (Jules 𝕏) · 09-23 07:29 · ♥70 ↻42 💬23 Robinhood Chain just crossed $1B DeFi TVL and most people still treat it like a meme farm.
Stablecoin supply is sitting at $1.065B after nearly 50% growth in 30 days. DEX volume printed $1.52B in the last 24 hours. The official/canonical bridge is holding ~$856M.
These aren’t launch numbers anymore. Morpho alone is carrying over $560M and Uniswap is doing the heavy lifting on volume.
The real test now is whether this liquidity starts leaking into more protocols and actual daily users instead of rotating between the same few venues.
Robinhood’s onchain bet is no longer theoretical. It’s starting to look like a real chain. https://x.com/JulesNetX/status/2102661694107353208
## @InsidersHouse (Insider's House) · 09-23 00:59 · ♥71 ↻17 💬4 Why I think $PAR can eventually overtake $PONS for the #1 launchpad position on Robinhood Chain:
1️⃣ Better launch architecture par launches directly into Uniswap V4 — no bonding curve, no graduation and no migration. The entire 1B supply enters a locked liquidity position from block one.
2️⃣ More than one fee flywheel $PAR doesn’t depend on a single buyback model. Protocol fees can fund $PAR buybacks/burns, while launches can also direct creator fees to holders, buyback & burn, or Floor Mode.
3️⃣ Floor Mode is a serious differentiator Fees can create an actual on-chain buy wall underneath the token. As fees accumulate, the floor is recalculated upward; tokens absorbed by the wall are burned. That creates a mechanism PONS doesn’t replicate in the same way.
4️⃣ Permissionless composability par can use any priceable token on Robinhood Chain as a quote asset, not just a limited set of launch assets. That means the launchpad can potentially become infrastructure for the broader ecosystem.
5️⃣ The current gap is exactly why the upside thesis exists PONS currently has enormous traction — roughly $2.37B 30-day DEX volume and $31.7M cumulative revenue according to DeFiLlama.
But PONS also shows how powerful the Robinhood launchpad market can become: Bitquery recorded $2.14B in post-graduation trading volume in just 32 days.
So the question isn’t whether the market exists.
It clearly does.
The question is which architecture captures the next wave.
My thesis:
PONS proved the demand. par can potentially build the infrastructure.
If par converts its superior composability + locked V4 liquidity + fee flywheels + Floor Mode into comparable activity, the $PAR value-accrual model becomes extremely interesting.
That is the battle I’m watching. 👀
$PAR | https://t.co/t8ZXZ1MU5p https://x.com/InsidersHouse/status/2102563470638260259