stablecoins · X 热门 · 2026-09-20 21:00 UTC

# stablecoins — X 热门讨论 (2026-09-20 21:00 UTC)

## @CatOfLongTails (Sixsmith) · 09-20 19:24 · ♥83 ↻7 💬8 It All Came True https://x.com/CatOfLongTails/status/2101754439791214801

## @CatfishFishy (Fishy Catfish) · 09-20 18:22 · ♥49 ↻7 💬1 New product being built by Chainlink and deployed on Aave changing that.

Anchorage would hold the underlying collateral for the duration of the loan, operate the collateral management system that serves as the source of truth for balances and lifecycle events, and execute liquidations as an OTC sale of the underlying asset.

Chainlink CustodySync would mirror custodial balances onchain with a non-transferable receipt token, and Chainlink price feeds would give both Aave and the custodian the same data, keeping LTV in sync.

Borrowed stablecoins would route to the borrower in a single transaction. > 引用 @StaniKulechov: A first-of-its-kind proposal to enable institutions to borrow stablecoins on Aave V4 against collateral held with a qualified custodian, accessing liquidity directly from Aave V4 markets.

## @malekanoms (Omid Malekan) · 09-20 14:40 · ♥44 ↻6 💬6 The thing that really stands out about this front-page WSJ story by @KevinTDugan is the way it acts like Congress was doing the digital asset industry a favor by even considering passing Clarity.

Crypto is not a volleyball team. It's not a Jeopardy contestant. It's a specific application of mathematics, a technology, and when combined with other technologies, a new way of interacting.

What does it mean for a technology and a tool to "choke"? Even the title "Crypto Blew Its Big Moment" sounds like poorly prompted AI slop.

Why was this the big moment? And since Armstrong's opposition to the yield provision (on a bill that wasn't even meant to cover stablecoins) is the central story of this article, why is the onus on the industry to prove competition with banks is good—no other disruptive industry has to constantly do that.

What's the actual story there? What facts or data can be presented beyond unverifiable quotes from staffers who work for politicians who must spin every outcome?

As usual, what the article doesn't do is grapple with what cryptocurrencies and blockchains actually do, or why they might be useful, or how regulations augment adoption. That would require intellectual curiosity, the ability to think outside of a boring bubble, and hard reporting. It would require not doing Jamie Dimon's dirty work.

And we should't be surprised, because the author's bio says "Writing about the culture of Wall Street." And if you read the comments, there is 100% consensus that crypto is a scam, a buffoon's assumption this article does nothing to challenge. It's yet another predictable wink to the peanut gallery, by people who are smart enough to seek a greater truth, but choose not to.

All of which is to say, another missed opportunity to do real reporting to inform the public of the much more complicated, but also much more interesting, story of what is actually happening. > 引用 @KevinTDugan: The collapse of the Clarity Act marked a spectacular choke by an industry that had just recently begun reveling in its new lobbying clout, with President Trump in its corner.

With @dgtokar and @Vlajournaliste

https://t.co/oMEKx92y4Q https://x.com/malekanoms/status/2101682794917196130

## @MissCryptoGER (MissCrypto) · 09-20 18:33 · ♥48 ↻6 💬1 Tokenisierte Aktien gab es längst. Doch jetzt öffnet die SEC für 5 Jahre den Weg für echten Onchain-Aktienhandel! Was heißt das für Krypto?👀

Welche Ausnahmen gibt es bis 2031? 1️⃣ Sogenannte TSVs dürfen tokenisierte US-Aktien über zugangsbeschränkte AMMs und Liquiditätspools handeln, ohne dafür als klassische Börse registriert zu sein.

2️⃣ Bestimmte Liquiditätsanbieter brauchen für diese Tätigkeit keine klassische Dealer-Registrierung.

Was heißt das für Krypto? Die Tokens müssen wirtschaftlich dieselben Rechte wie die klassische Aktie vermitteln. Reine synthetische Aktien-Tokens, die nur den Kurs nachbilden, sind ausgeschlossen.

Die Smart Contracts müssen öffentlich und auditierbar auf einer öffentlichen, permissionless Blockchain laufen.

➡️ Blockchain wird damit direkt Teil der regulierten Aktien-Infrastruktur!

Gehandelt werden können die Aktien u. a. gegen andere tokenisierte Aktien, Kryptoassets, Stablecoins oder tokenisierte Geldmarktfonds. Retail-Anleger sind übrigens ausdrücklich mitgedacht. Der Zugang bleibt aber kontrolliert.

➡️ Aktien und Krypto als Assets rücken auf derselben digitalen Ebene zusammen.

Nicht Krypto kopiert hier den Aktienmarkt. Der Aktienmarkt übernimmt immer mehr Krypto-Marktstruktur. https://x.com/MissCryptoGER/status/2101741431136387311

## @Wilson_WZW (David Wilson) · 09-20 17:38 · ♥43 ↻4 💬1 $XCN The pieces are clearly coming together!

• Onyx L1: built specifically for banks & financial institutions • 24,000 TPS + institutional-scale settlement • Hybrid architecture: DeFi + compliance + legacy banking compatibility • Onyx Mesh: permissioned infrastructure for securities, payments, CBDCs & trade settlement • Chain technology acquired: stablecoins, payments, wallets, cards, fiat connectivity & financial accounts • Chain products/customers now transitioning to Onyx • Onyx Card + Payments + Neobank rolling into the ecosystem • More products explicitly slated for Q4 2026

This has been building for more than two years. Now the architecture is becoming clear. The final piece? Adoption + institutional partnerships. That's what I'm watching for next. 👀 https://x.com/Wilson_WZW/status/2101727745935847480

## @AutismCapital (Autism Capital 🧩) · 09-20 17:45 · ♥42 ↻0 💬2 @deobfuscations Support for stablecoins (USDC, tether, etc.) and major cryotos like btc, eth, etc. no exchange, just wallet. https://x.com/AutismCapital/status/2101729433107542368