# DeFi — X 热门讨论 (2026-09-30 13:07 UTC)
## @SergeyNazarov (Sergey Nazarov) · 09-30 12:56 · ♥123 ↻42 💬17 The launch of CCIP 2.0 is something we've been working on with the world's top financial institutions for a while, we have now implemented their feedback on what is needed for institutional grade bridging of data and the movement of the digital assets themselves across both public and private chains.
The response from the capital markets community here at Sibos has been very positive, and it is clear that the additional compliance, risk management, configurability and network participation capabilities of CCIP 2.0 are something that institutions find attractive and useful.
I think the digital asset industry will end up at a new level of risk management for their data all of their tokenized value; where digital assets that are not bridged via a secure method and/or are relying on data that can be manipulated, will be viewed as much more risky. If the digital assets that bridge via providers which are not secure by default and/or keep repeatedly losing bridging keys, then they will receive worse asset risk scores which necessarily leads to worse terms for their usage as collateral, their inclusion on a balance sheet, and various other use cases. In some cases we are already seeing that having unreliable bridging or easy to manipualte data for valuation is leading to some digital assets to not be accepted for collateral or other users cases at all.
We are now working closely with top FMIs, the leading banks, top asset managers, top GSIs and various capital markets technology providers to enable digital assets to operate in a derisked way, to unlock the liquidity found in public chains and to efficiently connect the next generation of digital assets to the benefits of DeFi.
https://t.co/rYzhSWCcPY > 引用 @chainlink: CCIP 2.0 is officially live.
The infrastructure for the next $600 trillion in onchain finance is now in your hands.
🧵⬇️ https://t.co/5fvK4A4X40 https://x.com/SergeyNazarov/status/2105280564555092288
## @ChuzzyTech (Cleopatra) · 09-30 11:15 · ♥72 ↻7 💬65 If shielding cost nothing and touched no pool, it would be marketing.
On @Starknet it is a private action with a fee.
Every transaction on Starknet pays execution in STRK.
That part is normal, nothing new there.
What is different is what happens when you shield strkBTC.
That is not a free toggle you flip on.
It is a private action and private actions carry their own fee on top of the normal execution cost.
That fee goes into something called STRK20.
Think of it as a pool that shielding, unshielding and private DeFi volume all pass through.
It already has real users moving through it, not just a demo.
This is what makes shielding feel real to me. A free feature with no cost and no pool behind it would just be a slogan.
A fee attached to an actual pool means something is actually happening on chain when you shield.
Once strkBTC is shielded, using it stays private through specific app flows.
Endur for staking, avnu for swaps. Both let you interact with your BTC without publishing the size or the route.
None of this means anonymous. It does not mean hidden from everyone.
What it means is reduced public exposure, shielded balances and more control over what is visible to anyone looking at the chain.
If you want to see the actual fee and how much volume is moving through the pool right now,
Check the dashboard directly instead of going off a number someone quoted last month.
Does knowing shielding has a real fee attached change how seriously you take it as a privacy tool? https://x.com/ChuzzyTech/status/2105255290299924575
## @frongcommunity (Frong 🐸) · 09-30 10:11 · ♥70 ↻10 💬26 We will see you in the DEFI sector
@vladtenev https://t.co/D0mNKElkjI https://x.com/frongcommunity/status/2105239166304899192
## @stacy_muur (Stacy Muur) · 09-30 10:40 · ♥70 ↻12 💬15 Bitcoin Privacy on Starknet https://x.com/stacy_muur/status/2105246386337755615