# Robinhood Chain — X 热门讨论 (2026-09-14 04:33 UTC)
## @ZUKOWEB3166 (ZUKO) · 09-14 03:24 · ♥70 ↻11 💬69 TombHood is a Tomb Finance fork built natively on Robinhood Chain.
At its core, it's a three-token algorithmic peg system where 1 TBH is designed to track 1 PONS (Robinhood Chain's native meme token).
Instead of relying on a centralized reserve, the peg is maintained through an automated 6-hour clock: every epoch, the protocol checks the TWAP (time-weighted average price) of the TBH/PONS pool and decides whether to print new supply, hold steady, or open a bond-buying window.
Three tokens drive the whole system TBH (the peg itself), SHVL (the yield-bearing "shovel" token), and RIP (the bond mechanism) and together they form a closed loop that expands supply when demand is strong and contracts it when the peg is under pressure. $TBH {@tombhoodxyz }
A..........🧵🪡 > 引用 @tombhoodxyz: THREAD CONTEST IS LIVE 🪦 🥇 $300 🥈 $100 🥉 $50
Make a thread about Tombhood and explain: 1) What is Tombhood? 2) How can people get a WL spot?
Quote this post with your thread to enter.
Watch your rank on the leaderboard https://t.co/piW1KTBjLm https://t.co/JFc9vLKwnr https://x.com/ZUKOWEB3166/status/2099338581886062950
## @callmeperry3 (67 🦅( PERRYHIGHLIFE )) · 09-14 03:48 · ♥72 ↻7 💬71 something is being built on Robinhood Chain that is worth understanding before the Genesis window opens.
@tombhoodxyz is preparing its first Genesis Round, and the project is currently running WL Round 01; The Early Diggers.
The interesting part?
Your WL spot gives you early access to Genesis before it opens to the public.
So let me break down what TombHood actually is, how the system works, and exactly how to get your spot.
Website : https://t.co/kVUciIQe3A > 引用 @tombhoodxyz: THREAD CONTEST IS LIVE 🪦 🥇 $300 🥈 $100 🥉 $50
Make a thread about Tombhood and explain: 1) What is Tombhood? 2) How can people get a WL spot?
Quote this post with your thread to enter.
Watch your rank on the leaderboard https://t.co/piW1KTBjLm https://t.co/JFc9vLKwnr https://x.com/callmeperry3/status/2099344419954565132
## @tagsincos (00K) · 09-14 01:52 · ♥41 ↻1 💬44 multichain sounds like one expansion story.
in practice, @termix_ai is now dealing with several marketplace cold starts at once.
on BNB Chain, the mature end of https://t.co/1nms9juypY already has providers with hundreds of completed jobs. on Robinhood Chain, the current leaderboard is still much thinner, with its leading provider showing only one completed job. :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
personally, i think that contrast is more useful than counting supported networks.
deploying AACP somewhere new gives agents the rails.
it does not automatically bring local demand, specialized providers, repeat counterparties or enough transaction history to make discovery efficient.
every new chain therefore creates a liquidity problem of its own.
the interesting question for TermiX is whether shared identity and protocol infrastructure can shorten that cold start, so a new network does not have to rebuild an agent economy from zero.
if that happens, multichain becomes more than duplicated contracts.
it becomes a way for economic history built in one part of the network to help bootstrap another.
that is the layer i’m watching, not the chain count itself.
just my product view, not financial or trading advice.
@kaitoAi > 引用 @tagsincos: the newest @termix_ai numbers are impressive, but the metric i want next is not another total.
TermiX says https://t.co/1nms9juypY has now settled $19.68M across 370,319 jobs, with an average job size around $53.
personally, averages are where marketplace analysis can get misleading.
if most jobs really cluster near that level, https://t.co/1nms9juypY is developing into a genuinely machine native services market built around small, frequent transactions.
but if a relatively small number of larger jobs pull the average upward, the economic structure is very different.
so i’d rather see median job value, transaction size distribution and how much volume comes from repeat counterparties.
those numbers would tell us whether AACP is supporting thousands of independent micro contracts or simply processing activity that happens to average out at $53.
that distinction matters because infrastructure for high frequency $20 to $50 machine tasks needs very different economics from infrastructure built around occasional large contracts.
the latest growth is worth watching.
the composition of that growth is what would make the thesis stronger.
just my product analysis, not a trading or investment view.
@kaitoAi https://x.com/tagsincos/status/2099315403705209128