# stablecoins — X 热门讨论 (2026-09-24 11:44 UTC)
## @CoinDesk (CoinDesk) · 09-24 11:01 · ♥147 ↻34 💬20 NEW: The Trump administration is considering a plan to promote dollar-backed stablecoins overseas through joint ventures with private companies, aiming to cement dollar dominance and drive demand for U.S. Treasuries, per Bloomberg. https://t.co/33Xbg1PEkq https://x.com/CoinDesk/status/2103077364229902699
## @LokiCripto (𝗟𝗢𝗞𝗜) · 09-24 10:02 · ♥45 ↻35 💬21 🤖 AI agents are starting to spend money.
Mastercard is already building infrastructure that allows AI agents to search for products and execute purchases authorized by users.
But here’s where it gets interesting:
TRON is already building specifically for the agent economy.
x402 payments. AI agent identity and reputation. Programmable wallets. Stablecoin infrastructure. More than $700B in monthly stablecoin volume.
And now Privy is expanding its integration with TRON, making programmable transactions, wallets and stablecoin payments even easier.
AI → Agents → Wallets → Stablecoins → Autonomous payments.
The agent economy is coming.
And TRON is positioning itself as one of the best-prepared blockchains to become part of its financial infrastructure. 🌐🤖
#TRON #AI #TGF #TRONGlobalFriends https://x.com/LokiCripto/status/2103062394360549415
## @GoCryptoos (Go Crypto) · 09-24 06:23 · ♥58 ↻3 💬10 شبكة TRON تتجاوز 30 تريليون دولار.. من شبكة معاملات إلى بنية تحتية لحركة القيمة الرقمية https://x.com/GoCryptoos/status/2103007375430971460
## @reebmughal (۶۟ৎ Reeb ⸝⸝ ✧ ♡) · 09-24 08:18 · ♥40 ↻5 💬23 My Injective thesis is around Injective's RWA activity, if we compare it to Ondo which is Injective's biggest competitor I belive then we see soemthing very interesting.
They both have similar RWA activity but very different valuation.
Ondo: • RWA Value (Excluding Stablecoins): $1.4B • FDV: $4.3B
Injective: • RWA Value (Excluding Stablecoins): $1.1B • FDV: $800M
That’s only a ~$300M difference in RWA value, but a $3.5B+ difference in FDV.
So the question is:
Is Injective still being undervalued compared to its RWA activity?
The gap is worth watching imo. > 引用 @injective: Introducing the Injective @fomo Thesis Competition:
To celebrate the INJ integration on fomo, we’re giving away 500 $INJ on fomo for the best Injective theses 🥷
🥇 250 INJ for the best thesis 🥈 100 INJ each to 2nd and 3rd place 🎁 50 INJ split between other runner-ups
You have 48 Hours. To enter, make sure to follow us on fomo @injective, make a thesis under INJ and share it below 👇 https://x.com/reebmughal/status/2103036409669955718
## @Coachjv_ (Coach, JV) · 09-24 11:19 · ♥42 ↻2 💬2 I’ve been talking about this transition for years.
Stablecoins can expand the DIGITAL distribution of the dollar. Treasuries can become part of the collateral underneath that system.
DLT can change HOW money moves.
AI can change HOW people work.
These technologies don’t necessarily destroy the existing financial system.
They can become the rails underneath the NEXT version of it.
And that brings us to what I believe will become one of the defining economic conversations heading toward 2030:
OWNERSHIP.
If technology continues increasing productivity while replacing or restructuring certain forms of labor, simply trading your time for dollars may become an increasingly fragile strategy.
The gap could continue widening between people who primarily depend on wages and people who own productive assets.
That’s the K-shaped economy.
Own businesses. Own productive assets. Own equity. Own technology. Own scarce assets. Build cash flow.
Don’t just become a better consumer of the new financial system.
Become an OWNER in it.
2030 may look dramatically different from today.
Position yourself accordingly.
CAPL + DR™ https://x.com/Coachjv_/status/2103081989305762142