# stablecoins — X 热门讨论 (2026-10-01 08:13 UTC)
## @AshCrypto (Ash Crypto) · 10-01 07:56 · ♥209 ↻24 💬42 BREAKING: 🇬🇧 $1.3 Trillion UK bank Lloyds just settled a cross-border payment with Visa using stablecoins, allowing money to move 24/7.
Traditional banking is moving onchain. https://x.com/AshCrypto/status/2105567591972708548
## @Ox_milo (Milon) · 10-01 06:29 · ♥48 ↻4 💬47 Something I've been thinking about with @NucleusCodes
maybe reputation isn't the main product
Access is.
Think about what actually happens when a project launches a campaign
There are thousands of wallets. Thousands of posts. Hundreds of people trying to get noticed
The project still has to answer one annoying question:
who actually deserves the opportunity?
Nucleus is building a layer around that problem
Your onchain history can affect reputation
Your work during a campaign can affect contribution
Then those signals can turn into something tangible:
WL spots. Stablecoins. Other campaign rewards
You can see this split happening in live campaigns right now
ACCRETION, for example, separates its 1,140 GTD spots between reputation and contribution
CyberThrone does something similar with its own campaign
So the interesting part isn't really the leaderboard
It's what sits behind it
Nucleus is gradually turning reputation and contribution into a distribution mechanism
And that's a much bigger job than simply ranking wallets
Because once a ranking starts deciding who gets access, the quality of the signals becomes incredibly important
A bad ranking is just a bad ranking
A bad distribution layer can send the opportunity to the wrong people
That's the part I'm watching with Nucleus
Not how high someone sits on the board
But whether the system can consistently put the right opportunities in front of the right people https://x.com/Ox_milo/status/2105545496953844059
## @jul56502344 (Jul 🧙♂️,🧙♂️) · 10-01 01:29 · ♥40 ↻0 💬36 🌟I've been watching @termix_ai and the latest posts finally clicked. People still treat agents like smarter chatbots. That's too small.
👉The real shift is agents hiring each other.
🔹AACP gives them the missing rails: On-chain identity so you know who you're dealing with, job discovery, escrow that only releases after delivery is verified, and reputation that travels with the agent instead of dying inside one app.
🔹https://t.co/Kc9tOcfBki is where it actually shows up. You describe the work. An agent takes the job, delivers the result, and settles in stablecoins. This week a new video production agent joined. Drop your brand, message and vibe. It comes back with a finished promo film. One prompt. Full cut.
🔹Same idea with security audits and even an AI co-op partner for old NES games. Specialized workers instead of chat windows.
🔉Hundreds of thousands of agents are already registered and jobs keep settling on-chain. It still feels early, but the rails aren't theoretical anymore. Agents are starting to look like real economic participants, not demos. That's the part I keep watching most closely right now. https://x.com/jul56502344/status/2105470134274183573
## @dori_coin (dori) · 10-01 06:53 · ♥41 ↻6 💬5 Few are paying attention, but I think this is huge. CIP-113 means the capabilities $ETH tokens have can now be built on $ADA too.
With plain CNTs, there was no way to support issuer freeze and seize functions or KYC-based transfer restrictions. CIP-113 makes that possible.
That means Cardano can now meet the requirements for stablecoins and tokenized securities that have to be regulated and controllable, and for institutions issuing real-world assets.
Put simply, the size of the market Cardano can compete for just changed. > 引用 @angrycryptoshow: JUST IN: $ADA's CIP-113 is officially merged, a major upgrade unlocking programmable tokenization on #Cardano's EUTXO model, enhancing Cardano Native Assets with customizable logic for RWAs, stablecoins, and regulatory compliance to drive institutional adoption. https://x.com/dori_coin/status/2105551568431120864