# stablecoins — X 热门讨论 (2026-10-11 09:03 UTC)
## @TheVictorBuilds (TheVictorBuilds) · 10-11 08:36 · ♥41 ↻12 💬32 Look solana:So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112 just took a nasty dive from the $120 down to the $109.37 level we are seeing now. We just watched nearly a billion dollars get wiped out in liquidations across the board with BTC puking down to 83k and dragging the whole altcoin market down with it. The derivatives space just got completely flushed and paper hands are panic selling. But if you stop staring at the red candles and look at the actual live onchain data the disconnect is insane. New Solana wallets are up 124% since early September. That is roughly 1.7 million new addresses being spun up every single day. The number of addresses holding stablecoins just crossed 14 million this week. Network usage is exploding while the price action bleeds out.
On the macro side we have elevated Treasury yields and general macro uncertainty choking off risk appetite globally. Wall Street is pulling back ETF inflows and institutional traders are deleveraging fast. That is exactly why the technicals look like a crime scene right now. But zoom in on the micro developments because they are completely divergent. Samsung is quietly preparing to push a Solana powered cross border payment feature to 82 million compatible mobile phones by the end of October. Over 5 trillion in stablecoin volume has already moved through the chain this year alone. The market is entirely focused on the short term leverage wipeout and completely ignoring the structural plumbing getting installed on millions of consumer devices. Value capture takes time to reflect on the chart but the infrastructure is already there.
Dont get chopped up trying to catch falling knives in the middle of a flush. The order book shows massive institutional liquidity sitting between 100 and 106. This isnt a clean breakout setup yet because the market needs to dig deeper into those bids to establish a real floor. Set your limit orders near that psychological 100 level and walk away. Let the overleveraged longs puke their bags directly into your bids. When the macro pressure finally eases up and retail wakes up to the Samsung rollout the capital rotation back into the most liquid high throughput chain is going to be aggressive. > 引用 @TheVictorBuilds: BITCOIN WILL NEVER ACTUALLY REACH 21 MILLION COINS
Everyone repeats the 21 million hard cap meme like gospel. it is close but mathematically false. because the network issues block rewards in discrete satoshis and rounds down after enough halvings, the true terminal supply is exactly 20,999,999.9769 BTC. we are currently watching the US spot ETF complex effortlessly hold well above the $100B AUM mark. active lifetime trading hours for BTC have already eclipsed the 55 year old S&P 500 because this market literally never sleeps. you have to realize what this means when you look at the immediate order book depth. retail thinks this supply cap is just a neat fun fact but institutions see absolute mathematical scarcity that no central bank committee can ever tamper with. Global M2 supply is expanding again and major central banks are structurally trapped in a perpetual easing cycle just to service mounting sovereign debt. at the micro level, the recent halving dragged Bitcoin's annual inflation rate below 0.8%. compare that directly to gold which is expanding its supply at 1.5 to 2% yearly through physical mining. we have a legacy financial system actively hemorrhaging purchasing power while the primary digital reserve asset is hardcoded into a declining issuance schedule. when you track current on chain wallet flows, you see that OTC desks are essentially bone dry right now. major miners are refusing to dump their bags because their elevated break even costs dictate holding out for higher valuations. it is a perfect storm of a rapidly contracting circulating supply meeting a massive wall of fresh institutional mandates allocating in the 50-100M range. https://x.com/TheVictorBuilds/status/2109201426526404862
## @cukyn1812 (Min) · 10-11 07:00 · ♥42 ↻4 💬39 Without an active service page your autonomous agent is missing thousands of open job orders
Most developers spend endless nights perfecting machine learning pipelines only to keep their code trapped in local repositories where potential clients can never discover or interact with it. Building powerful capabilities without an accessible commercial interface guarantees zero organic inbound requests from the decentralized market.
Creating an official Agent Service Page on https://t.co/WZY6aDPfcA powered by @termix_ai transforms your dormant script into an active digital enterprise. By listing specific skills such as Solidity auditing data extraction or media generation you define exact parameter requirements alongside clear pricing tiers in stablecoins.
Your listing connects directly to an ERC-8004 identity profile that displays verifiable reputation metrics from historical transactions. When clients post orders matching your domain your agent can automatically quote prices or allow users to buy structured deliverables on demand without requiring custom manual communication.
This public availability explains why the ecosystem supported by TermiX has expanded to 469,207 indexed agents completing 530,320 cumulative jobs. Instead of paying arbitrary subscription cuts your agent keeps its earnings thanks to a 1-3% platform take rate, turning your technical hobby into an autonomous revenue engine.
Which specialized capability will you package into your agent service listing today? https://x.com/cukyn1812/status/2109177178143457346
## @infinity__max (HoneyBit.eth) · 10-11 05:06 · ♥43 ↻2 💬32 GM ☀️💙
One day, paying with crypto for pretty much anything will hopefully feel as normal as using a bank card.
And honestly, I can’t wait for that day! 😅
Made a little video in Persian about @WalletConnect , stablecoins, and why I’m excited about where things are heading.
Are we getting closer to that future than we think? 👀
@wctclub https://x.com/infinity__max/status/2109148487958814936
## @Rayleigh_com (Rayleigh Silvers) · 10-11 03:50 · ♥41 ↻9 💬20 Distributed Key Generation (DKG) on Rialo: Decentralizing Cryptographic Control
In decentralized systems, security should never depend on a single entity holding the keys to critical operations. Rialo leverages Distributed Key Generation (DKG) to establish shared cryptographic authority without relying on a trusted dealer, creating a foundation for threshold signing and trust-minimized onchain workflows.
Threshold Cryptography - Distributing Key Control
Traditional cryptographic systems often rely on a single private key to authorize transactions or control sensitive resources. This creates a single point of failure: whoever controls the key controls the authority.
Threshold cryptography distributes that authority across multiple participants. Instead of one entity holding the entire private key, each participant holds a key share. In a 3-of-5 configuration, for example, any three of the five participants can cooperate to produce a valid signature, while no individual participant can authorize an operation alone.
The result is a more resilient security model that reduces dependence on any single key holder.
DKG - Generating a Shared Key Without a Trusted Dealer
A conventional approach to threshold cryptography would use a trusted dealer to generate a private key, split it into shares, and distribute them. However, this reintroduces the very risk decentralization is meant to eliminate.
DKG removes the trusted dealer from the key-generation process.
Each participant independently generates private cryptographic contributions and distributes corresponding shares to other participants. These contributions are then combined mathematically to establish a shared secret and derive each participant’s final key share.
Crucially, no participant needs to know the complete group secret. The system establishes distributed control from the beginning, rather than creating a centralized key and attempting to decentralize it afterward.
The Mathematics Behind DKG
DKG relies on polynomial-based secret sharing.
Each participant chooses a private polynomial whose constant term represents their secret contribution. Participants privately distribute evaluations of their polynomials to one another, then combine the received values to calculate their individual shares of the aggregate group secret.
The core principle is that a polynomial of degree (t-1) can be reconstructed from (t) valid points using Lagrange interpolation. Consequently, a threshold number of key shares can jointly recover the secret mathematically - or, in threshold signing protocols, produce a cryptographic output without explicitly reconstructing the full private key.
The group derives a corresponding public key, and the resulting threshold signature can be verified against that same public key, just like a conventional signature.
This provides three essential properties:
No trusted dealer: The group generates key material collectively.
Distributed authority: Fewer than the required threshold of shares cannot exercise the group’s cryptographic authority.
Public verifiability: Threshold signatures can be independently verified against the group public key.
How Rialo Applies DKG
Rialo uses distributed key control to support trust-minimized workflows, particularly conditional transactions and cross-chain operations secured by validator quorums.
Consider a stablecoin protocol coordinating minting across multiple blockchains. Rialo can serve as the hub that coordinates the workflow through an onchain master account.
The process follows three stages:
1. Conditional execution
The protocol defines a transaction that executes once a specified condition is met, such as reaching a particular block height.
2. Threshold signing
Validators use their individual key shares to generate partial signatures for the destination-chain transaction. A sufficient quorum combines these partial signatures into a valid threshold signature.
3. Cross-chain execution
A relayer or keeper delivers the signed payload to the destination chain. If the signature passes verification, the destination-chain account executes the requested action, such as minting stablecoins.
This architecture combines programmable execution with distributed cryptographic authorization. Transactions can execute automatically when their conditions are satisfied, while critical actions still require approval from a validator quorum.
No individual validator can authorize the operation alone, and the underlying group key is generated without a trusted dealer.
The same model can support scheduled multi-step workflows, quorum-gated authorizations, shared validator control, and coordinated signing across domains.
Limitations and the Next Step: Verifiable Secret Sharing (VSS)
Basic DKG does not automatically guarantee that every participant behaves honestly. A malicious participant could submit invalid shares or distribute inconsistent values, potentially undermining the protocol.
Verifiable Secret Sharing (VSS) strengthens the process by adding verifiable commitments to the polynomial coefficients. Participants can check whether the shares they receive are consistent with those commitments, helping detect malicious or faulty contributions.
Combining DKG with VSS provides a stronger foundation for threshold cryptography in adversarial environments. VSS is therefore an important next step toward making distributed key-generation systems more robust.
DKG is more than a cryptographic key-generation technique. It is a foundation for distributing authority across a decentralized network without introducing a single trusted key holder.
By combining DKG, threshold signing, and conditional execution, Rialo can support workflows in which sensitive operations are programmable, automatically triggered, and protected by collective authorization.
DKG helps Rialo build distributed cryptographic control without requiring any single party to generate or hold the complete private key.
From shared secrets to cross-chain execution, the principle is clear: decentralize not only where transactions execute, but also who has the power to authorize them.
Correct the opening typo around DKG
@RialoHQ https://x.com/Rayleigh_com/status/2109129511086281177
## @f_schaeffler (Frank Schäffler) · 10-11 07:31 · ♥51 ↻4 💬2 Washington nutzt Stablecoins, um seine Schulden zu finanzieren. Brüssel begrenzt sie, um den Euro zu schützen. In beiden Fällen gilt Geld als Sache des Staates. Dabei sollten die Bürger selbst entscheiden, welchem Geld sie vertrauen. Mein Sonntagsblock: https://t.co/klu5aWTuVz https://x.com/f_schaeffler/status/2109185194242478299
## @Big14teru (G will❤️🔥) · 10-10 19:21 · ♥41 ↻4 💬11 AI agents pay before anyone checks the work. Freelancers do the work and hope they get paid.
We built Vouch to fix both: pay when it's delivered, get paid when it's verified.
Our entry for @colosseum's Crypto World's Fair, built deep on @Tempo and live on @base.
Try it 👉 https://t.co/7aabS5HmZZ
How Vouch works:
1. Lock: the payer locks stablecoins against a written scope. On Tempo that's one fee-sponsored transaction or one MPP charge. On Base it's an x402 payment in USDC, no gas needed. 2. Deliver: the worker submits, and every file is fingerprinted (sha256) and pinned, so what was sent is what gets judged. 3. Verify: an AI verifier (Claude Sonnet 5) checks the delivery against the scope, item by item, and records its verdict onchain. It can never move money. 4. Settle: the money releases automatically under the payer's own rules (verdict, confidence, amount cap, review window) or on approval. Either side can take a dispute to an arbiter.
For AI agents it's one MCP tool call or one HTTP request. Pay per acceptable outcome, not per call.
Why this matters for @Tempo: MPP, co-authored by Tempo and Stripe, made it easy for machines to pay. Vouch adds the step after payment: was the work actually delivered? Every Vouch job is funded with an MPP charge or a TIP-20 transfer memo, fees are sponsored so nobody needs gas, locked funds can earn through Tempo Earn while the work happens, and workers can take payouts privately into a Tempo Zone. Conditional payments bring more real commerce, by people and by agents, to stablecoins on Tempo.
Why this matters for @base: x402 lets any agent pay any API. Vouch lets agents pay for outcomes instead of requests: the same x402 call settles USDC into the Vouch vault through EIP-3009, with no ETH needed on the payer side. That's the trust layer onchain agents need before they hire each other, and hire people, at scale.
What's live today (testnet, by choice): • 2 outside users took real jobs and were paid automatically (verifier scores 93% and 95%) • a verdict 10 to 15 seconds after delivery • every step onchain: funded, delivered, attested, settled • 106 Foundry tests on the contracts • 0 wrong releases across 12 verifier calibration runs
Try it in about 10 minutes: pick an open test job, sign in with your email, deliver it, and watch the verifier check it. Score 85% or more and you're paid automatically 15 minutes later. No wallet, no gas. 👉 https://t.co/7aabS5HmZZ
Building agents? Hire through Vouch from Claude Code, Codex or Cursor: https://t.co/kE4mlKz0q9
#AIAgents #Stablecoins #CryptoWorldsFair > 引用 @colosseum: 1/ Crypto World's Fair has commenced! 🎡
🌍Our online hackathon is open to builders & founders across blockchain ecosystems
💰Over $800k in total prizes and $2.5 million from Colosseum's venture fund
🏁Product submissions due by October 12, 2026
Join: https://t.co/pm2437ccDm https://t.co/qtPg2WiUVn https://x.com/Big14teru/status/2109001447484334528
## @FinanceLancelot (Financelot) · 10-10 22:34 · ♥41 ↻3 💬1 @ronaldoputera All going according to plan.
What better way to introduce digital IDs, stablecoins and Technocracy than a "cyber-attack" on the banking system. https://t.co/D0Ti0SYMeA > 引用 @FinanceLancelot: Oh sh!t... @andreijikh just went down the rabbit hole.
Except it isn't 2028...🤫 https://t.co/7wPCNh9oHv https://x.com/FinanceLancelot/status/2109049955524493811